Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children - Effects on postoperative analgesia

被引:74
作者
Lejus, C
Delile, L
Plattner, V
Baron, M
Guillou, S
Heloury, V
Souron, R
机构
[1] Serv. d'Anesthesie Reanimation Chir., Bloc Operatoire de Chir. Pediat., C.H.R.
关键词
analgesics; opioid; nalbuphine; anesthesia; pediatric; anesthetic techniques; patient-controlled analgesia; pain; postoperative; surgery techniques; appendectomy; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199604000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The benefit of laparoscopy to patients has been clearly established in adults undergoing cholecystectomy. Results are less clear for appendectomy, The current study was undertaken to compare the respective S-day postoperative periods after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children, Methods: Sixty-three children (aged 8-15 yr) scheduled for appendectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: open and laparoscopic. Postoperative evaluation included delay of postoperative recovery (walking and feeding), pain assessment by visual analog scale during the 3 subsequent days, amount of nalbuphine administered via a patient-controlled analgesia system during the first 48 h and responses by children, patents, and nurses on the overall quality of analgesia. Results: There was no difference between groups for demographic data (particularly macroscopic aspect of appendix), analgesia, sedation, delay before eating and walking, incidence of urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, Operative time was longer (P less than or equal to 0.05) in the laparoscopic group (54 +/- 17 min) than in the open group (39 +/- 18 min). Thirty five percent of the children had pain at the shoulder in the LAP group versus ten percent in the open group (P less than or equal to 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopy did not improve analgesia and postoperative recovery after appendectomy in children.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 806
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] ADVANCES IN ENDOSCOPY OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN
    GANS, SL
    BERCI, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1971, 6 (02) : 199 - +
  • [2] IS THERE A ROLE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY IN PEDIATRIC-SURGERY
    GILCHRIST, BF
    LOBE, TE
    SCHROPP, KP
    KAY, GA
    HIXSON, SD
    WRENN, EL
    PHILIPPE, PG
    HOLLABAUGH, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1992, 27 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [3] MACBURNEY C, 1894, ANN SURG, V20, P38
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION
    MCANENA, OJ
    AUSTIN, O
    OCONNELL, PR
    HEDERMAN, WP
    GOREY, TF
    FITZPATRICK, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (08) : 818 - 820
  • [5] LAPAROSCOPIC OPERATIONS IN PEDIATRIC-SURGERY
    MILLER, SS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) : 986 - 987
  • [6] COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE RESPIRATORY-FUNCTION AFTER LAPAROSCOPY OR OPEN LAPAROTOMY FOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    PUTENSENHIMMER, G
    PUTENSEN, C
    LAMMER, H
    LINGNAU, W
    AIGNER, F
    BENZER, H
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (04) : 675 - 680
  • [7] RICHARDS W, 1993, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V177, P473
  • [8] SAVEDRA M C, 1989, Pediatrician, V16, P24
  • [9] SCHRODER DM, 1993, AM SURGEON, V59, P541
  • [10] SOPER NJ, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V174, P114