Real and misconceived limitations to decision based design with utility analysis

被引:88
作者
Thurston, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Decis Syst Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.1363610
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Decision based design shows great promise in improving the design process, but is not a panacea. The design problem of interest here is tradeoffs between conflicting objectives, particularly under uncertainty. The focus is on multiattribute utility theory. This paper describes several real limitations to utility analysis in the context of engineering design, and attempts to clear up several common misconceptions about it. The real limitations are in the initial configuration and analytic design phases, and in overcoming difficulties in group decision making. The major misconceptions relate to independence conditions, the functional form and assessment biases.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 182
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Research in Engineering Design, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01581343
[3]  
Arrow JK., 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[4]  
COOK HE, 1997, PRODUCT MANAGEMENT
[5]  
Fishburn P.C., 1970, RES ANAL CORP MCLEAN
[6]  
Hauser J. R., 1988, HARVARD BUSINESS REV, V66
[7]   A framework for decision-based engineering design [J].
Hazelrigg, GA .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1998, 120 (04) :653-658
[8]   The implications of Arrow's impossibility theorem on approaches to optimal engineering design [J].
Hazelrigg, GA .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1996, 118 (02) :161-164
[9]  
Howard RA, 1984, PRINCIPLES APPL DECI
[10]  
KAHNEMAN D, 1982, JUDGEMENT UNCERTAINI