Early withdrawal from cervical cancer screening: the question of cost-effectiveness

被引:7
作者
Philips, Z
Whynes, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Trent Inst Hlth Serv Res, Hlth Econ Unit, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
cervical cancer; cost-effectiveness; mathematical model; screening; simulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00199-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In countries such as the UK, mass population screening for cervical cancer has been undertaken since the 1960s. Although of established effectiveness, no formal evaluation of the screening protocol was carried out prior to its implementation. On the basis of a published mathematical modelling exercise, it has been speculated that withdrawing women from the screening programme at an earlier age than at present, whilst leading to a higher rate of invasive cervical cancer (ICC), could reduce resource use. Using estimates of screening and treatment costs, and of expected life-years lost following earlier withdrawal, we simulated cost-effectiveness ratios for various scenarios described by the model. Median cost savings resulting from a life-year lost never exceeded pound 10 000 for any scenario, although the estimates were particularly sensitive to the assumed age at cancer presentation and the rate of cancer progression. Our findings seem to offer little economic support for the early withdrawal of subjects from the cervical screening programme. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1775 / 1780
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Health Technol Assess
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Cancer survival trends in England and Wales, 1971-1995: deprivation and NHS region
[3]   HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TESTING IN PRIMARY CERVICAL SCREENING [J].
CUZICK, J ;
SZAREWSKI, A ;
TERRY, G ;
HO, L ;
HANBY, A ;
MADDOX, P ;
ANDERSON, M ;
KOCJAN, G ;
STEELE, ST ;
GUILLEBAUD, J .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8964) :1533-1536
[4]  
CUZICK J, 1997, NEW DEV CERVICAL CAN
[5]   Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening - An international review [J].
Fahs, MC ;
Plichta, SB ;
Mandelblatt, JS .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (03) :211-230
[6]   Cervical screening interval: costing the options in one health authority [J].
Grant, CM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1999, 21 (02) :140-144
[7]   A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING - HEALTH-POLICY IMPLICATIONS [J].
GYRDHANSEN, D ;
HOLUND, B ;
ANDERSEN, P .
HEALTH POLICY, 1995, 34 (01) :35-51
[8]   Is it cost effective to introduce screening programmes for colorectal cancer? Illustrating the principles of optimal resource allocation [J].
GyrdHansen, D .
HEALTH POLICY, 1997, 41 (03) :189-199
[9]   ECONOMIC-ASPECTS OF CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING [J].
KOOPMANSCHAP, M ;
LUBBE, KTN ;
VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ ;
VANAGT, HMA ;
VANBALLEGOOIJEN, M ;
HABBEMA, JDF .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 30 (10) :1081-1087
[10]   The value of cervical screening in women over 50 years of age - Time for a multicentre audit [J].
McKenzie, CA ;
Duncan, ID .
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 43 (01) :19-20