Visual Assessment of Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Is Inadequate to Select Patients for Thrombolysis

被引:56
作者
Campbell, Bruce C. V. [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Soren [2 ]
Foster, Sarah J. [2 ]
Desmond, Patricia M. [2 ]
Parsons, Mark W. [4 ,5 ]
Butcher, Kenneth S. [7 ]
Barber, P. Alan [8 ]
Levi, Christopher R. [4 ,5 ]
Bladin, Christopher F. [6 ]
Donnan, Geoffrey A. [3 ]
Davis, Stephen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med & Neurol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Radiol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Florey Neurosci Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Dept Neurol, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Hunter Med Res Inst, John Hunter Hosp, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Neurol, Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Auckland, Ctr Brain Res, Auckland 1, New Zealand
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Stroke; Tissue plasminogen activator; Ischemic penumbra; STROKE;
D O I
10.1159/000311080
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: For MR perfusion-diffusion mismatch to be clinically useful as a means of selecting patients for thrombolysis, it needs to occur in real time at the MRI console. Visual mismatch assessment has been used clinically and in trials but has not been systematically validated. We compared the accuracy of visually rating console-generated images with offline volumetric measurements using data from the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). Methods: Perfusion time-to-peak (TTP) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) (as generated by commercial MRI console software) and T-max perfusion maps (which required offline calculation) were visually rated. Perfusion-diffusion mismatch, defined as a ratio of perfusion: diffusion lesion volume of >1.2, was independently scored by 1 expert and 2 inexperienced raters blinded to calculated volumes and clinical information. Visual mismatch was compared with region-of-interest-based volumetric calculation, which was used as the gold standard. Results: Volumetric calculation demonstrated perfusion-diffusion mismatch in 85/99 patients. Visual TTP-DWI mismatch was correctly classified by the experienced rater in 82% of the cases (sensitivity: 0.86; specificity: 0.54) compared to 73% for the inexperienced raters (sensitivity: 0.75; specificity: 0.57). The interrater reliability for TTP-DWI mismatch was moderate (kappa = 0.50). Visual T-max-DWI mismatch performed better (agreement -93 and 87%, sensitivity -95 and 88%, specificity -77 and 82% for the experienced and inexperienced raters, respectively). Conclusions: The assessment of visual TTP-DWI mismatch at the MRI console is insufficiently reliable for use in clinical trials. Differences in perfusion analysis technique and visual inaccuracies combine to make visual TTP-DWI mismatch substantially different to volumetric T-max-DWI mismatch. Automated software that applies perfusion thresholds may improve the reproducibility of real-time mismatch assessment. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 596
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: The diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study [J].
Albers, Gregory W. ;
Thijs, Vincent N. ;
Wechsle, Lawrence ;
Kemp, Stephanie ;
Schlaug, Gottfried ;
Skalabrin, Elaine ;
Bammer, Roland ;
Kakuda, Wataru ;
Lansberg, Maarten G. ;
Shuaib, Ashfaq ;
Coplin, William ;
Hamilton, Scott ;
Moseley, Michael ;
Marks, Michael P. .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 60 (05) :508-517
[2]   Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis [J].
Butcher, KS ;
Parsons, M ;
MacGregor, L ;
Barber, PA ;
Chalk, J ;
Bladin, C ;
Levi, C ;
Kimber, T ;
Schultz, D ;
Fink, J ;
Tress, B ;
Donnan, G ;
Davis, S .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (06) :1153-1159
[3]   BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[4]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 2010, STROKE, V41, pE44
[5]   Reliability of assessing percentage of diffusion-perfusion mismatch [J].
Coutts, SB ;
Simon, JE ;
Tomanek, AI ;
Barber, PA ;
Chan, J ;
Hudon, ME ;
Mitchell, JR ;
Frayne, R ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Buchan, AM ;
Demchuk, AM .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (07) :1681-1683
[6]   Using mismatch on MRI to select thrombolytic responders - An attractive hypothesis awaiting confirmation [J].
Davis, SM ;
Donnan, GA .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (05) :1100-1101
[7]   Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial [J].
Davis, Stephen M. ;
Donnan, Geoffrey A. ;
Parsons, Mark W. ;
Levi, Christopher ;
Butcher, Kenneth S. ;
Peeters, Andre ;
Barber, P. Alan ;
Bladin, Christopher ;
De Silva, Deidre A. ;
Byrnes, Graham ;
Chalk, Jonathan B. ;
Fink, John N. ;
Kimber, Thomas E. ;
Schultz, David ;
Hand, Peter J. ;
Frayne, Judith ;
Hankey, Graeme ;
Muir, Keith ;
Gerraty, Richard ;
Tress, Brian M. ;
Desmond, Patricia M. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2008, 7 (04) :299-309
[8]   Penumbral selection of patients for trials of acute stroke therapy [J].
Donnan, Geoffrey A. ;
Baron, Jean-Claude ;
Ma, Henry ;
Davis, Stephen M. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2009, 8 (03) :261-269
[9]   Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Hacke, Werner ;
Furlan, Anthony J. ;
Al-Rawi, Yasir ;
Davalos, Antoni ;
Fiebach, Jochen B. ;
Gruber, Franz ;
Kaste, Markku ;
Lipka, Leslie J. ;
Pedraza, Salvador ;
Ringleb, Peter A. ;
Rowley, Howard A. ;
Schneider, Dietmar ;
Schwamm, Lee H. ;
Leal, Joaquin Serena ;
Soehngen, Mariola ;
Teal, Phil A. ;
Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, Karin ;
Wintermark, Max ;
Warach, Steven .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2009, 8 (02) :141-150
[10]   Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct [J].
Hjort, N ;
Butcher, K ;
Davis, SM ;
Kidwell, CS ;
Koroshetz, WJ ;
Röther, J ;
Schellinger, PD ;
Warach, S ;
Ostergaard, L .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (02) :388-397