Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis

被引：146

作者：

van Zorneren, Martijn ^{[1
]}

Spears, Russell ^{[2
]}

Leach, Colinn Wayne ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Social Psychol, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands

[2] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales

[3] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2010年 / 30卷 / 04期

关键词：

Fear; Group efficacy; Environmental action; Coping; Collective action; COLLECTIVE ACTION; EMOTIONAL APPROACH; SOCIAL IDENTITY; BEHAVIOR; COPE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.006

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Two experiments examined the psychological power of fear and group efficacy beliefs to increase environmental action intentions against the climate crisis Extending a dual pathway model of coping with collective disadvantage results showed evidence for emotion-focused approach coping Environmental action intentions were increased by individuals manipulated fear of the negative future consequences of the climate crisis (Experiments 1-2) Additionally results showed evidence for problem-focused approach coping Individuals measured (Experiment 1) and manipulated group efficacy beliefs (Experiment 2) increased environmental action intentions The results thus suggest that the dual pathway model can be successfully applied to a psychological analysis of emotion- and problem-focused approach coping with the climate crisis We discuss the theoretical and practical Implications of these results (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

引用

页码：339 / 346

页数：8

共 52 条

[1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].

AJZEN, I .

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211

[2]

[Anonymous], 2001, Appraisal Processes in Emotion

[3]

[Anonymous], HUMAN DECISION MAKIN

[4] Coping through emotional approach: A new look at emotion, coping, and health-related outcomes [J].

Austenfeld, JL ;

Stanton, AL .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2004, 72 (06) :1335-1363

[5] Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].

Bandura, A .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26

[6]

Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI

[7]

Bandura A., 1995, SELF EFFICACY CHANGI, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511527692, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511527692]

[8] MODEL OF EGOTISTICAL RELATIVE DEPRIVATION [J].

CROSBY, F .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 83 (02) :85-113

[9] TOWARD A THEORY OF REVOLUTION [J].

DAVIES, JC .

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (01) :5-19

[10] A FORMAL INTERPRETATION OF THE THEORY OF RELATIVE DEPRIVATION [J].

DAVIS, JA .

SOCIOMETRY, 1959, 22 (04) :280-296

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →