Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making

被引:2148
作者
de Groot, R. S. [1 ]
Alkemade, R. [2 ]
Braat, L. [3 ]
Hein, L. [1 ]
Willemen, L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Environm Assessment Agcy PBL, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Wageningen Univ, Land Dynam Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Ecosystem services; Valuation; Modelling; Landscape planning; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; VALUATION; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS; BENEFITS; SUPPORT; COSTS; SCALE; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite the growing body of literature on ecosystem services, still many challenges remain to structurally integrate ecosystem services in landscape planning, management and design. This paper therefore aims to provide an overview of the challenges involved in applying ecosystem service assessment and valuation to environmental management and discuss some solutions to come to a comprehensive and practical framework. First the issue of defining and classifying ecosystem services is discussed followed by approaches to quantify and value ecosystem services. The main part of the paper is focussed on the question how to analyze trade-offs involved in land cover and land use change, including spatial analysis and dynamic modelling tools. Issues of scale are addressed, as well as the question how to determine the total economic value of different management states. Finally, developments and challenges regarding the inclusion of ecosystem services in integrative landscape planning and decision-making tools are discussed. It is concluded that the ecosystem service approach and ecosystem service valuation efforts have changed the terms of discussion on nature conservation, natural resource management, and other areas of public policy. It is now widely recognized that nature conservation and conservation management strategies do not necessarily pose a trade-off between the "environment" and "development". Investments in conservation, restoration and sustainable ecosystem use are increasingly seen as a "win-win situation" which generates substantial ecological, social and economic benefits. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 272
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space
    Alessa, Lilian
    Kliskey, Andrew
    Brown, Gregory
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [2] GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss
    Alkemade, Rob
    van Oorschot, Mark
    Miles, Lera
    Nellemann, Christian
    Bakkenes, Michel
    ten Brink, Ben
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2009, 12 (03) : 374 - 390
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, Multifunctionality. Towards an analytical framework, P159
  • [4] [Anonymous], INT MOD GLOB ENV CHA
  • [5] [Anonymous], NATURES SERVICES SOC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING CU
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being
  • [8] Modelling land change: the issue of use and cover in wide-scale applications
    Bakker, M. M.
    Veldkamp, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (04) : 203 - 213
  • [9] Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met?
    Balmford, A
    Whitten, T
    [J]. ORYX, 2003, 37 (02) : 238 - 250
  • [10] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953