Artificial intelligence is breaking patent law Comment

被引：11

作者：

George, Alexandra ^{[1
]}

Walsh, Toby ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ New South Wales, Law, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[2] Univ New South Wales, Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[3] CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia

来源：

NATURE | 2022年 / 605卷 / 7911期

关键词：

Computer science; Law; Policy;

D O I：

10.1038/d41586-022-01391-x

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

The patent system assumes that inventors are human. Inventions devised by machines require their own intellectual property law and an international treaty.

引用

页码：616 / 618

页数：3

共 9 条

[1] Abbott R., 2020, WASHBURN LAW J, V60, P429
[2] Abbott R, 2019, UCLA LAW REV, V66, P2
[3] Afshar Mimi S., 2022, Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal, V13/, P55
[4] [Anonymous], 2007, Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc.
[5] [Anonymous], 2022, COMM PAT V THAL
[6] DABUS, 2019, Patent No. [2019/057809, 2019057809]
[7] Kim Daria., 2020, Gewerblicher Rechtschutz und Urheberrecht International, V69/, P443
[8] Schuster W Michael., 2018, Washington Lee Law Review, V75/4, P1945
[9] HUMAN INVENTORSHIP IN EUROPEAN PATENT LAW
Stankova, Eva
[J]. CAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL, 2021, 80 (02) : 338 - 365

← 1 →