Estimating the occurrence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Gulf War (1990-1991) Veterans using capture-recapture methods - An assessment of case ascertainment bias

被引:54
作者
Coffman, CJ
Horner, RD
Grambow, SC
Lindquist, J
机构
[1] Durham VA Med Ctr, Inst Clin & Epidemiol Res, Biostat Unit, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[3] NINDS, Off Minor Hlth & Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
ascertainment; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; capture-recapture; Gulf War; log-linear models; sample coverage;
D O I
10.1159/000083297
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Using data from a recent report that indicated a 2-fold higher risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) among veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, we applied capture-recapture methodology to estimate possible under-ascertainment of ALS cases among deployed and non-deployed military personnel who were on active duty during that war. Study Design and Setting: One of the most serious concerns facing field epidemiological investigations is that of case ascertainment bias, particularly when it is differential among the study groups. Capture-recapture methods, however, have promise as an approach to assessing the impact of case ascertainment bias in such studies. To overcome potential limitations of any one approach, three different estimation methods were used: log-linear models, sample coverage, and ecological models, to obtain a comprehensive view of under-ascertainment bias in these populations. Results: All three approaches indicated differential undercount of ALS cases with modest under-ascertainment likely to have occurred among non-deployed military personnel, but little under-ascertainment among the deployed. After correcting the rates for under-ascertainment, the age-adjusted risk of ALS remained elevated among military personnel who had been deployed to S.W. Asia during the 1991 Gulf War, confirming the earlier report. Conclusions:Capture-recapture methods area useful approach to assessing the magnitude of case ascertainment bias in epidemiological studies from which ascertainment-adjusted estimates of rates and relative risks can be calculated. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, Selected papers of hirotugu akaike, P267
[2]  
BROOKS BR, 1998, CURRENT ISSUES ALS T
[3]  
BURHNAHM K, 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT
[4]   The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data [J].
Chao, A ;
Tsay, PK ;
Lin, SH ;
Shau, WY ;
Chao, DY .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (20) :3123-3157
[5]   A sample coverage approach to multiple-system estimation with application to census undercount [J].
Chao, A ;
Tsay, PK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (441) :283-293
[6]  
Chapman D. G., 1951, University of California Publications Statistics, V1, P131
[7]  
Cormack RM, 1999, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V52, P909, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00058-X
[8]   Estimating deaths from industrial injury by capture-recapture: a cautionary tale [J].
Cormack, RM ;
Chang, YF ;
Smith, GS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (06) :1053-1059
[9]  
Hook EB, 1999, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V52, P917, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00060-8
[10]   Capture recapture methods in epidemiology: Methods and limitations [J].
Hook, EB ;
Regal, RR .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1995, 17 (02) :243-264