Timing of CMF chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer:: role of endocrine responsiveness of the tumor

被引:16
作者
Colleoni, M
Li, S
Gelber, RD
Coates, AS
Castiglione-Gertsch, M
Price, KN
Lindtner, J
Rudenstam, CM
Crivellari, D
Collins, J
Pagani, O
Simoncini, E
Thürlimann, B
Murray, E
Forbes, J
Erzen, D
Holmberg, S
Veronesi, A
Goldhirsch, A
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Med Oncol, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, IBCSG, Ctr Stat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Technol Res Fdn, Boston, MA USA
[4] Canc Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] IBCSG Coordinating Ctr, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Inst Oncol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[8] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, W Swedish Breast Canc Study Grp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[9] Ctr Riferimento Oncol, I-33081 Aviano, Italy
[10] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
[12] Oncol Med Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
[13] Kantonsspital, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[14] Groote Schuur Hosp, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[15] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[16] Australian New Zealand Breast Canc Trials Grp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[17] SU Moelndals Hosp, Dept Surg, Molndal, Sweden
关键词
breast cancer; chemoendocrine therapy; estrogen receptors; postmenopausal; tamoxifen; timing of chemotherapy;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdi163
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Controversy persists about whether chemotherapy benefits all breast cancer patients, Patients and methods: In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial VII. 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen plus three concurrent courses of cyclophosphamide. methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil ('classical' CMF) chemotherapy, either early, delayed or both, In IBCSG trial IX. 1669 postmenopausal patients with node-negative disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone or three courses of adjuvant classical CMF prior to tamoxifen. Results were assessed according to estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor. Results: For patients with node-positive. ER-positive disease, adding CMF either early, delayed or both reduced the risk of relapse by 21% (P = 0.06), 26% (P = 0.02) and 25% (P = 0.02). respectively. compared with tamoxifen alone. There was no difference in disease-free survival when CMF was given prior to tamoxifen in patients with node-negative. ER-positive tumors. Conclusions: CMF given concurrently (early, delayed or both) with tamoxilen was more effective than tamoxifen alone for patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive breast cancer, supporting late administration of chemotherapy even after commencement of tamoxiten. In contrast. sequential CMF and tamoxifen for patients with node-negative, endocrine-responsive disease was ineffective.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 725
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
  • [2] ALBAIN KS, 2003, BREAST, V12, P12
  • [3] [Anonymous], LONG TERM TAMOXIFEN
  • [4] Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials
    Bonetti, M
    Gelber, RD
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2004, 5 (03) : 465 - 481
  • [5] Bonetti M, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P2595, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:19<2595::AID-SIM562>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-M
  • [7] Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen for node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients
    CastiglioneGertsch, M
    Goldhirsch, A
    Gusterson, B
    Bettelheim, R
    Reed, R
    Gusset, H
    Geiser, K
    Hurny, C
    Bernhard, J
    Hangartner, A
    Maibach, R
    Pedowski, R
    Gelber, R
    Price, K
    Peterson, H
    Zelen, M
    Isley, M
    Hinkle, R
    Kay, RG
    Holdaway, IM
    Harvey, VJ
    Jagusch, MF
    Neave, L
    Mason, BM
    Evans, B
    Benjamin, CS
    Carter, JF
    Gillman, JC
    Mack, D
    BensonCooper, D
    Monfardini, S
    Galligioni, E
    Crivellari, D
    Buonadonna, A
    Massarut, S
    Rossi, C
    Candiani, E
    Carbone, A
    Volpe, R
    Trovo, MG
    Roncadin, M
    Santini, GF
    Villalta, D
    Coran, F
    Morassut, S
    Marini, G
    Simoncini, E
    Marpicati, P
    Zaniboni, A
    Sartori, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) : 1385 - 1394
  • [8] Overhauling the breast cancer overview: are subsets subversive?
    Coates, AS
    Goldhirsch, A
    Gelber, RD
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2002, 3 (09) : 525 - 526
  • [9] Influence of endocrine-related factors on response to perioperative chemotherapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer
    Colleoni, M
    Gelber, S
    Coates, AS
    Castiglione-Gertsch, M
    Gelber, RD
    Price, K
    Rudenstam, CM
    Lindtner, J
    Collins, J
    Thürlimann, B
    Holmberg, SB
    Cortes-Funes, H
    Simoncini, E
    Murray, E
    Fey, M
    Goldhirsch, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (21) : 4141 - 4149
  • [10] Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer:: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF
    Colleoni, M
    Litman, HJ
    Castiglione-Gertsch, M
    Sauerbrei, W
    Gelber, RD
    Bonetti, M
    Coates, AS
    Schumacher, M
    Bastert, G
    Rudenstam, CM
    Schmoor, C
    Lindtner, J
    Collins, J
    Thürlimann, B
    Holmberg, SB
    Crivellari, D
    Beyerle, C
    Neumann, RLA
    Goldhirsch, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (11) : 1705 - 1714