The genomic evaluation system in the United States: Past, present, future

被引:171
作者
Wiggans, G. R. [1 ]
VanRaden, P. M. [1 ]
Cooper, T. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Anim Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
genomic evaluation; SNP effect; reliability; SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; SELECTION; GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-3866
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Implementation of genomic evaluation has caused profound changes in dairy cattle breeding. All young bulls bought by major artificial insemination organizations now are selected based on such evaluation. Evaluation reliability can reach approximately 75% for yield traits, which is adequate for marketing semen of 2-yr-old bulls. Shortened generation interval from using genomic evaluations is the most important factor in increasing the rate of genetic improvement. Genomic evaluations are based on 42,503 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotyped with technology that became available in 2007. The first unofficial USDA genomic evaluations were released in 2008 and became official for Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss in 2009. Evaluation accuracy has increased steadily from including additional bulls with genotypes and traditional evaluations (predictor animals). Some of that increase occurs automatically as young genotyped bulls receive a progeny test evaluation at 5 yr of age. Cow contribution to evaluation accuracy is increased by decreasing mean and variance of their evaluations so that they are similar to bull evaluations. Integration of US and Canadian genotype databases was critical to achieving acceptable initial accuracy and continues to benefit both countries. Genotype exchange with other countries added predictor bulls for Brown Swiss. In 2010, a low-density chip with 2,900 SNP and a high-density chip with 777,962 SNP were released. The low-density chip has increased greatly the number of animals genotyped and is expected to replace microsatellites in parentage verification. The high-density chip can increase evaluation accuracy by better tracking of loci responsible for genetic differences. To integrate information from chips of various densities, a method to impute missing genotypes was developed based on splitting each genotype into its maternal and paternal haplotypes and tracing their inheritance through the pedigree. The same method is used to impute genotypes of nongenotyped dams based on genotyped progeny and mates. Reliability of resulting evaluations is discounted to reflect errors inherent in the process. Further increases in evaluation accuracy are expected because of added predictor animals and more SNP. The large population of existing genotypes can be used to evaluate new traits; however, phenotypic observations must be obtained for enough animals to allow estimation of SNP effects with sufficient accuracy for application to the general population.
引用
收藏
页码:3202 / 3211
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*AFF, 2011, AX GEN WID BOS 1 ARR
[2]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[3]   Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals [J].
Andersson, L .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2001, 2 (02) :130-138
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P 9 WORLD C GEN APPL
[5]   Detection of putative loci affecting milk, health, and type traits in a US Holstein population using 70 microsatellite markers in a genome scan [J].
Ashwell, MS ;
Van Tassell, CP .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (11) :2497-2502
[6]  
BAYLY, 2008, INSIDE LIC
[7]   Visualization of results from genomic evaluations [J].
Cole, J. B. ;
VanRaden, P. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (06) :2727-2740
[8]   Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits [J].
Cole, J. B. ;
VanRaden, P. M. ;
O'Connell, J. R. ;
Van Tassell, C. P. ;
Sonstegard, T. S. ;
Schnabel, R. D. ;
Taylor, J. F. ;
Wiggans, G. R. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (06) :2931-2946
[9]  
David X., 2010, Interbull Bulletin, V41
[10]  
De Roos A PW., 2009, Interbull Bulletin, V39, P47