Microbial diversity of biofilms in dental unit water systems

被引:74
作者
Singh, R
Stine, OC
Smith, DL
Spitznagel, JK
Labib, ME
Williams, HN
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Craniofacial Biol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Periodont, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Novaflux Technol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.69.6.3412-3420.2003
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We investigated the microbial diversity of biofilms found in dental unit water systems (DUWS) by three methods. The first was microscopic examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), acridine orange staining, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Most bacteria present in the biofilm were viable. FISH detected the beta and gamma, but not the alpha, subclasses of Proteobacteria. In the second method, 55 cultivated biofilm isolates were identified with the Biolog system, fatty acid analysis, and 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing. Only 16S identified all 55 isolates, which represented 13 genera. The most common organisms, as shown by analyses of 16S rDNA, belonged to the genera Afipia (28%) and Sphingomonas (16%). The third method was a culture-independent direct amplification and sequencing of 165 subclones from community biofilm 16S rDNA. This method revealed 40 genera: the most common ones included Leptospira (20%), Sphingomonas (14%), Bacillus (7%), Escherichia (6%), Geobacter (5%), and Pseudomonas (5%). Some of these organisms may be opportunistic pathogens. Our results have demonstrated that a biofilm in a health care setting may harbor a vast diversity of organisms. The results also reflect the limitations of culture-based techniques to detect and identify bacteria. Although this is the greatest diversity reported in DUWS biofilms, other genera may have been missed. Using a technique based on jackknife subsampling, we projected that a 25-fold increase in the number of subclones sequenced would approximately double the number of genera observed, reflecting the richness and high diversity of microbial communities in these biofilms.
引用
收藏
页码:3412 / 3420
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units [J].
Barbeau, J ;
Tanguay, R ;
Faucher, E ;
Avezard, C ;
Trudel, L ;
Cote, L ;
Prevost, AP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 62 (11) :3954-3959
[3]   Biofilms, infectious agents, and dental unit waterlines: a review [J].
Barbeau, J ;
Gauthier, C ;
Payment, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 44 (11) :1019-1028
[4]   EFFECTS OF CULTURE CONDITIONS AND BIOFILM FORMATION ON THE IODINE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LEGIONELLA-PNEUMOPHILA [J].
CARGILL, KL ;
PYLE, BH ;
SAUER, RL ;
MCFETERS, GA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 38 (05) :423-429
[5]  
Christensen BB, 1999, METHOD ENZYMOL, V310, P20
[6]   Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections [J].
Costerton, JW ;
Stewart, PS ;
Greenberg, EP .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5418) :1318-1322
[7]   BACTERIAL BIOFILMS IN NATURE AND DISEASE [J].
COSTERTON, JW ;
CHENG, KJ ;
GEESEY, GG ;
LADD, TI ;
NICKEL, JC ;
DASGUPTA, M ;
MARRIE, TJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1987, 41 :435-464
[8]   Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred.: II.: Error probabilities [J].
Ewing, B ;
Green, P .
GENOME RESEARCH, 1998, 8 (03) :186-194
[9]   Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred.: I.: Accuracy assessment [J].
Ewing, B ;
Hillier, L ;
Wendl, MC ;
Green, P .
GENOME RESEARCH, 1998, 8 (03) :175-185
[10]   PREVALENCE OF LEGIONELLA-SPECIFIC IGG AND IGM ANTIBODY IN A DENTAL CLINIC POPULATION [J].
FOTOS, PG ;
WESTFALL, HN ;
SNYDER, IS ;
MILLER, RW ;
MUTCHLER, BM .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1985, 64 (12) :1382-1385