Intraarticular administration of ketorolac, morphine, and ropivacaine combined with Intraarticular patient-controlled regional analgesia for pain relief after shoulder surgery:: A randomized, double-blind study

被引:29
作者
Axelsson, Kjell [1 ]
Gupta, Anil
Johanzon, Eva
Berg, Elisabeth
Ekback, Gustav
Rawal, Narinder
Enstrom, Peter
Nordensson, Ulf
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Orebro, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000297297.79822.00
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: In this study we assessed the efficacy of intraarticular regional analgesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. METHODS: Fifty-one patients undergoing shoulder surgery (Bankart) were recruited into this double-blind study. At the end of the operation, patients were randomized to three groups to receive intraarticularly via a catheter: Group 1: ropivacaine 90 mg (9 mL), morphine 4 mg (10 mL), and ketorolac 30 mg (1 mL (total volume 20 mL; Groups 2 and 3: saline (20 mL. In addition, Groups 1 and 3 received 1 mL saline IV while Group 2 received. ketorolac 30 mg (1 mL) IV. Postoperatively, Group 1 received pain relief using 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine on demand via the intraarticular catheter while Groups 2 and 3 received 10 mL of saline intraarticularly. Group 3 was the Control group. RESULTS: Postoperative pain at rest and on movement were lower in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 during the first 30 and 120 min, respectively. The time to first request for local anesthetic infusion was longer in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). The median morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours was less in Groups 1 and 2 than in Group 3 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in analgesic consumption between Group 1 and Group 2. The median satisfaction score was higher in Group 1 compared with Groups 2 (P < 0.05) and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of intraarticular ropivacaine, morphine, and ketorolac followed by intermittent injections of ropivacaine as needed provided better pain relief, less morphine consumption, and improved patient satisfaction compared with the control group. The group that received IV ketorolac consumed less morphine and was more satisfied with treatment than patients in the control group.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 333
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Comparison of the morphine-sparing effects of diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine after major orthopedic surgery [J].
Alexander, R ;
El-Moalem, HE ;
Gan, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2002, 14 (03) :187-192
[2]
Patient-controlled regional analgesia (PCRA) with ropivacaine after arthroscopic subacromial decompression [J].
Axelsson, K ;
Nordenson, U ;
Johanzon, E ;
Rawal, N ;
Ekbäck, G ;
Lidegran, G ;
Gupta, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (08) :993-1000
[3]
Borgeat A, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P218
[4]
Analgesic effect of intra-articular ketorolac in knee arthroscopy:: comparison of morphine and bupivacaine [J].
Calmet, J ;
Esteve, C ;
Boada, S ;
Giné, J .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2004, 12 (06) :552-555
[5]
Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery [J].
Chung, F ;
Ritchie, E ;
Su, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (04) :808-816
[6]
Postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy: The effects of intra-articular ketorolac and or morphine [J].
Gupta, A ;
Axelsson, K ;
Allvin, R ;
Liszka-Hackzell, J ;
Rawal, N ;
Althoff, B ;
Augustini, BG .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (03) :225-230
[7]
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
[8]
Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: A quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Liu, Spencer S. ;
Richman, Jeffrey M. ;
Thirlby, Richard C. ;
Wu, Christopher L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (06) :914-932
[9]
A systematic review of intra-articular local anesthesia for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery [J].
Moiniche, S ;
Mikkelsen, S ;
Wetterslev, J ;
Dahl, JB .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (05) :430-437
[10]
Ng HP, 2006, REGION ANESTH PAIN M, V31, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.09.009