Incentives of carbon dioxide regulation for investment in low-carbon electricity technologies in Texas

被引:16
作者
Castillo, Anya [2 ]
Linn, Joshua [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Electricity; Investment; Carbon price;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper compares the incentives a carbon dioxide emissions price creates for investment in low carbon dioxide-emitting technologies in the electricity sector. We consider the extent to which operational differences across generation technologies - particularly, nuclear, wind and solar photovoltaic - create differences in the incentives for new investment, which is measured by the operating profits of a potential entrant. First, astylized model of an electricity system demonstrates that the composition of the existing generation system may cause electricity prices to increase by different amounts over time when a carbon dioxide price is imposed. Differences in operation across technologies therefore translate to differences in the operating profits of a potential entrant. Then, a detailed simulation model is used to consider a hypothetical carbon dioxide price of $10-$50 per metric ton for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) market. The simulations show that, for the range of prices considered, the increase in electricity prices is positively correlated with output from a typical wind unit, but the correlation is much weaker for nuclear and photovoltaic. Consequently, a carbon dioxide price creates much stronger investment incentives for wind than for nuclear or photovoltaic technologies in the Texas market. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1831 / 1844
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SYST ADV MOD SAM
[2]  
BROWER M, 2007, WIND GENERATION ASSE
[3]  
BURTRAW P, 2003, RFF HAIKU ELECT MARK
[4]   Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: What are the gains from trade? [J].
Carlson, C ;
Burtraw, D ;
Cropper, M ;
Palmer, KL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (06) :1292-1326
[5]  
CONNORS S, 2004, 2004003 LFEE RP
[6]  
CULLEN JA, 2009, MEASURING ENV BENEFI
[7]  
*EL REL COUNC TEX, 2009, ERCOT 2008 HOURL WIN
[8]  
*EL REL COUNC TEX, 2009, 2008 DEM EN REP
[9]  
*EL REL COUNC TEX, 2009, STEAD STAT POW FLOW
[10]   Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous [J].
Fischer, C ;
Parry, IWH ;
Pizer, WA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (03) :523-545