Involvement in treatment decision-making: Its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation

被引:72
作者
Entwistle, Vikki [1 ]
Prior, Maria [2 ]
Skea, Zoe C. [3 ]
Francis, Jillian J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Social Dimens Hlth Inst, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
关键词
Scotland; diabetes; patient involvement; decision-making; patient-professional relations; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policymakers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type I or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multipractitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 375
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Beauchamp TL., 1983, Principles of biomedical ethics, V2
[2]   Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer [J].
Beaver, K ;
Jones, D ;
Susnerwala, S ;
Craven, O ;
Tomlinson, M ;
Witham, G ;
Luker, KA .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (02) :103-113
[3]   The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations [J].
Bugge, Carol ;
Entwistle, Vikki A. ;
Watt, Ian S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (08) :2065-2078
[4]   'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment [J].
Collins, S ;
Drew, P ;
Watt, I ;
Entwistle, V .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (12) :2611-2627
[5]   Women's preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests [J].
Davey, HM ;
Lim, J ;
Butow, PN ;
Barratt, AL ;
Redman, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 58 (09) :1699-1707
[6]  
Doherty Carole, 2005, J Nurs Manag, V13, P119, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2004.00498.x
[7]  
Edwards A, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P151, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00116.x
[8]   The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks [J].
Elwyn, G ;
Hutchings, H ;
Edwards, A ;
Rapport, F ;
Wensing, M ;
Cheung, WY ;
Grol, R .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (01) :34-42
[9]   Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy [J].
Entwistle, V ;
Williams, B ;
Skea, Z ;
MacLennan, G ;
Bhattacharya, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (02) :499-509
[10]   Considerations of 'fit' and patient involvement in decision making [J].
Entwistle, VA .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2006, 9 (02) :95-97