Does tactical voting matter? The political impact of tactical voting in recent British elections

被引:19
作者
Kim, H [1 ]
Fording, RC
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0010414001034003003
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Although much has been written about tactical voting, few studies have attempted to show its impact on the seat distribution within Parliament and subsequent government makeup in countries with single-member plurality systems. The authors attempt to assess the magnitude and impact of tactical voting in recent British general elections. They build a model of tactical voting by identifying factors known to affect the level of tactical voting measurable using available data. Based on this model, they generate predicted levels of tactical voting for all parties within each district. Based on these predicted values, they adjust actual election data to produce a new set of data containing a would-be election outcome in the absence of tactical voting. By comparing actual election data, adjusted election data, and the seat share of political parties in the parliaments after these elections, they discuss the political impact of tactical voting in the United Kingdom.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 311
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ALVAREZ R, IN PRESS BRIT J POLI
[2]  
[Anonymous], BRIT ELECTION STUDY
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECPR PARTY MANIFESTO
[4]  
[Anonymous], BRIT ELECTION STUDY
[5]  
[Anonymous], BRIT GEN ELECTION 19
[7]   Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure [J].
Blais, A ;
Nadeau, R .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 1996, 15 (01) :39-52
[8]   STRATEGIC AND PROTEST VOTING FOR 3RD PARTIES - THE CASE OF THE CANADIAN NDP [J].
BOWLER, S ;
LANOUE, DJ .
WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1992, 45 (02) :485-499
[9]   PARTY LOYALTIES IN COMPLEX SETTINGS - STV AND PARTY IDENTIFICATION [J].
BOWLER, S ;
FARRELL, DM .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1991, 39 (02) :350-362
[10]  
Budge I., 1998, NEW BRIT POLITICS