Evaluation of the smear layer removal and decalcification effect of QMix, maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentine

被引:32
作者
Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev [1 ]
Jain, Isha [1 ]
Tay, Franklin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Univ, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Manipal Coll Dent Sci, Manipal, Karnataka, India
[2] Augusta Univ, Dept Endodont, Dent Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
Decalcification; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; Irrigation; Maleic acid; Root entine; Smear layer; ENDODONTIC IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS; OUT BOND STRENGTH; SEALING ABILITY; CHELATING-AGENTS; MINERAL-CONTENT; ANTIBACTERIAL; OBTURATION; EROSION; MICROHARDNESS; PENETRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Objectives: The objective of the presentin vitro study was to evaluate the canal wall smear layer removal capacity and mineral content distribution of root canal dentine after irrigation with QMix, 7% maleic acid (MA) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA). Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were subjected to root canal instrumentation and divided into four groups: [1] 7% MA + 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), [2] 17% EDTA+ 2.5% NaOCl, [3] QMix + 2.5% NaOCl and [4] 0.9% saline (negative control). After irrigation, the teeth were examined byscanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine the presence or absence of smear layer. Formineral content assessment, 40 root-halves were divided into four groups and treated with 7% MA, QMix, 17% EDTA and saline. Mineral content was evaluated using SEM-energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Results: There was no significant difference between QMix, MA and EDTA in removal of smear layer from coronal and middle third of the canal spaces. In the apical third, MA performed better. Calcium was decreased more with QMix with no difference between MA and EDTA. Phosphorous was reduced more with MA and QMix than EDTA with no difference between MA and QMix. Similar result was observed with magnesium level. Carbon was reduced more with EDTA with no difference between QMix and MA. Oxygen was reduced significantly more with MA with no difference between QMix and EDTA. Conclusion: 7% MA had superior smear layer removal ability compared with QMix and 17% EDTA. Calcium level was decreased more with QMix while phosphorus level was decreased more with 7% MA and QMix respectively. Clinical significance: The present study highlights the effect of newer chelating agentson smear layer removal and decalcification of root canal dentine, which is required for disinfection of the root canal space and maintenance of the structural integrity of the teeth. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
DEMINERALIZATION AND REMINERALIZATION EVALUATION TECHNIQUES [J].
ARENDS, J ;
TENBOSCH, JJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1992, 71 :924-928
[2]
Effects of endodontic irrigation solutions on mineral content of root canal dentin using ICP-AES technique [J].
Ari, H ;
Erdemir, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2005, 31 (03) :187-189
[3]
EFFECTS OF SURFACE-TREATMENT ON THE FREE-SURFACE ENERGY OF DENTIN [J].
ATTAL, JP ;
ASMUSSEN, E ;
DEGRANGE, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (04) :259-264
[4]
A comparative in vitro evaluation of cytotoxic effects of EDTA and maleic acid: Root canal irrigants [J].
Ballal, N. Vasudev ;
Kundabala, M. ;
Bhat, Seetharama ;
Rao, Nageshwar ;
Rao, B. S. Satish .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 108 (04) :633-638
[5]
Comparison of the Efficacy of Maleic Acid and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid in Smear Layer Removal from Instrumented Human Root Canal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study [J].
Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev ;
Kandian, Sreenesh ;
Mala, Kundabala ;
Seetharama, Kadengodlu ;
Acharya, Shashirashmi .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (11) :1573-1576
[6]
Smear Layer Removal by Auxiliary Chemical Substances in Biomechanical Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study [J].
Carvalho, Alessandra Sverberi ;
Ribeiro Camargo, Carlos Henrique ;
Valera, Marcia Carneiro ;
Afonso Camargo, Samira Esteves ;
Gasparoto Mancini, Maria Nadir .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2008, 34 (11) :1396-1400
[7]
THE INFLUENCE OF THE SMEAR LAYER ON THE SEALING ABILITY OF CANAL OBTURATION [J].
CERGNEUX, M ;
CIUCCHI, B ;
DIETSCHI, JM ;
HOLZ, J .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1987, 20 (05) :228-232
[8]
The Effect of QMix, an Experimental Antibacterial Root Canal Irrigant, on Removal of Canal Wall Smear Layer and Debris [J].
Dai, Lin ;
Khechen, Khaled ;
Khan, Sara ;
Gillen, Brian ;
Loushine, Bethany A. ;
Wimmer, Courtney E. ;
Gutmann, James L. ;
Pashley, David ;
Tay, Franklin R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2011, 37 (01) :80-84
[9]
Effects of chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite on mineral content of root dentin [J].
Dogan, H ;
Çalt, S .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (09) :578-580
[10]
The effect of the irrigant QMix on removal of canal wall smear layer: an ex vivo study [J].
Eliot, Colin ;
Hatton, John F. ;
Stewart, Gregory P. ;
Hildebolt, Charles F. ;
Gillespie, M. Jane ;
Gutmann, James L. .
ODONTOLOGY, 2014, 102 (02) :232-240