The impact of aromatic ring count on compound developability: further insights by examining carbo- and hetero-aromatic and -aliphatic ring types

被引:341
作者
Ritchie, Timothy J. [1 ]
Macdonald, Simon J. F. [2 ]
Young, Robert J. [3 ]
Pickett, Stephen D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] TJR Chem, I-21020 Ranco, VA, Italy
[2] GlaxoSmithKline Med Res Ctr, Resp CEDD, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Med Res Ctr, Dept CSC Med Chem, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
[4] GlaxoSmithKline Med Res Ctr, Computat & Struct Chem, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
关键词
ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2010.11.014
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The impact of carboaromatic, heteroaromatic, carboaliphatic and heteroaliphatic ring counts and fused aromatic ring count on several developability measures (solubility, lipophilicity, protein binding, P450 inhibition and hERG binding) is the topic for this review article. Recent results indicate that increasing ring counts have detrimental effects on developability in the order carboaromatics >> heteroaromatics > carboaliphatics > heteroaliphatics, with heteroaliphatics exerting a beneficial effect in many cases. Increasing aromatic ring count exerts effects on several developability parameters that are lipophilicity- and size-independent, and fused aromatic systems have a beneficial effect relative to their nonfused counterparts. Increasing aromatic ring count has a detrimental effect on human bioavailability parameters, and heteroaromatic ring count (but not other ring counts) has increased over time in marketed oral drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   HERG binding specificity and binding site structure: evidence from a fragment-based evolutionary computing SAR study [J].
Bains, W ;
Basman, A ;
White, C .
PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 86 (02) :205-233
[2]   Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein [J].
Fournier, T ;
Medjoubi-N, N ;
Porquet, D .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND MOLECULAR ENZYMOLOGY, 2000, 1482 (1-2) :157-171
[3]   Plasma protein binding affinity and its relationship to molecular structure: An in-silico analysis [J].
Gleeson, M. Paul .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 50 (01) :101-112
[4]   Getting physical in drug discovery: a contemporary perspective on solubility and hydrophobicity [J].
Hill, Alan P. ;
Young, Robert J. .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2010, 15 (15-16) :648-655
[5]   ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 6. Can oral bioavailability in humans be effectively predicted by simple molecular property-based rules? [J].
Hou, Tingjun ;
Wang, Junmei ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Xu, Xiaojie .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (02) :460-463
[6]   BioCores: identification of a drug/natural product-based privileged structural motif for small-molecule lead discovery [J].
Kombarov, Roman ;
Altieri, Andrea ;
Genis, Dmitry ;
Kirpichenok, Mikhail ;
Kochubey, Valeriy ;
Rakitina, Natalia ;
Titarenko, Zoya .
MOLECULAR DIVERSITY, 2010, 14 (01) :193-200
[7]   Straightforward recursive partitioning model for discarding insoluble compounds in the drug discovery process [J].
Lamanna, Claudia ;
Bellini, Marta ;
Padova, Alessandro ;
Westerberg, Goran ;
Maccari, Laura .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 51 (10) :2891-2897
[8]   The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry [J].
Leeson, Paul D. ;
Springthorpe, Brian .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2007, 6 (11) :881-890
[9]   Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs [J].
Leeson, PD ;
Davis, AM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (25) :6338-6348
[10]  
LEESON PD, 2010, MEDCHEMCOMM, DOI DOI 10.1039/COD00157K