The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors

被引:266
作者
McCormack, Gavin R. [1 ]
Giles-Corti, Billie [1 ]
Bulsara, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
environment; exercise; physical activity; walking;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.01.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The presence and mix of destinations is an important aspect of the built environment that may encourage or discourage physical activity. This study examined the association between the proximity and mix of neighbourhood destinations and physical activity. Methods. Secondary analysis was undertaken on physical activity data from Western Australian adults (n=1394). These data were linked with geographical information systems (GIs) data including the presence and the mix of destinations located within 400 and 1500 in from respondents' homes. Associations with walking for transport and recreation and vigorous physical activity were examined. Results. Access to post boxes, bus stops, convenience stores, newsagencies, shopping malls, and transit stations within 400 in (OR 1.63-5.00) and schools, transit stations, newsagencies, convenience stores and shopping malls within 1500 in (OR 1.75-2.38) was associated with participation in regular transport-related walking. A dose-response relationship between the mix of destinations and walking for transport was also found. Each additional destination within 400 and 1500 in resulted in an additional 12 and 11 min/fortnight spent walking for transport, respectively. Conclusion. Proximity and mix of destinations appears strongly associated with walking for transport, but not walking for recreation or vigorous activity. Increasing the diversity of destinations may contribute to adults doing more transport-related walking and achieving recommended levels of physical activity. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ANDY S, 1996, J PLAN EDUC RES, V35, P184
[2]  
Armstrong T., 2000, PHYS ACTIVITY PATTER
[3]   Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility [J].
AultmanHall, L ;
Roorda, M ;
Baetz, BW .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 1997, 123 (01) :10-17
[4]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2003, INF PAP CENS POP HOU
[5]   Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: evidence of a 'coastal effect' [J].
Bauman, A ;
Smith, B ;
Stoker, L ;
Bellew, B ;
Booth, M .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 23 (03) :322-324
[6]   Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults [J].
Booth, ML ;
Owen, N ;
Bauman, AE ;
Gore, CJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (01) :153-159
[7]  
BULL FC, 2000, PHYS ACTIVITY LEVELS
[8]  
Cervero R., 1996, TRANSPORT POLICY, V3, P127, DOI DOI 10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9
[9]  
Dishman RK., 1994, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FI, P214
[10]   Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland [J].
Duncan, M ;
Mummery, K .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 40 (04) :363-372