Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England

被引:65
作者
Brennan, M. L. [1 ]
Kemp, R. [1 ]
Christley, R. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Epidemiol Grp, Neston CH64 7TE, England
关键词
contact; network; biosecurity; cattle; cluster analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.009
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Little is known regarding the types and frequencies of contact that exist between farms and which of these may act as pathogen transmission routes; however it is likely that farms demonstrate considerable heterogeneity in such contacts. In this cross-sectional study, we explored the direct and indirect contact types and frequencies that exist between cattle farms within a region, focusing on potential routes of pathogen transmission. The owners/managers of 56 farms located in a 10 km by 10 km study area in northwest England were administered an interview-based questionnaire between June and September 2005. Information was obtained relating to contact types and frequencies, including those involving animal movements, equipment sharing between farms and any contractors or companies visiting the farms. The data was explored using hierarchical cluster analysis and network analysis. There was considerable variation between farms arising from different contact types. Some networks exhibited great connectivity, incorporating approximately 90% of the farms interviewed in a single component, whilst other networks were more fragmented, with multiple small components (sets of connected farms not linked with other farms). A range of factors influencing contact between farms were identified. For example, contiguous farms were more likely to be linked via other contacts, such as sharing of equipment and direct farm-to-farm animal movements (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The frequency of contacts was also investigated; it is likely that the amount of contact a farm receives from a company or contractor and whether or not biosecurity is performed after contact would impact on disease transmission potential. We found considerable heterogeneity in contact frequency and that many company and contractor personnel undertook little biosecurity. These findings lead to greater understanding of inter-farm contact and may aid development of appropriate biosecurity practices and control procedures, and inform mathematical modelling of infectious diseases. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 260
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Anderson J. F., 1998, Bovine Practitioner, V32, P61
[2]   Biosecurity and biocontainment in alpaca operations [J].
Barrington, GM ;
Allen, AJ ;
Parish, SM ;
Tibary, A .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2006, 61 (2-3) :217-225
[3]   Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission [J].
Bates, TW ;
Thurmond, MC ;
Carpenter, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2001, 62 (07) :1121-1129
[4]   Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread [J].
Bigras-Poulin, M. ;
Thompson, R. A. ;
Chriel, M. ;
Mortensen, S. ;
Greiner, M. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2006, 76 (1-2) :11-39
[5]  
Caldow G. L., 1998, Cattle Practice, V6, P175
[6]   Infection in social networks: Using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals [J].
Christley, RM ;
Pinchbeck, GL ;
Bowers, RG ;
Clancy, D ;
French, NP ;
Bennett, R ;
Turner, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 162 (10) :1024-1031
[7]   Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) [J].
Corner, LAL ;
Pfeiffer, DU ;
Morris, RS .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2003, 59 (03) :147-167
[8]  
*DEFRA, 2005, REP SALM CATTL
[9]  
*DEFRA, 2006, AN REC DAT DAIR COWS
[10]  
*DEFRA, 2005, REV AGR HORT LEV BOD