Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy -: A prospective study

被引:184
作者
Roder, JD
Stein, HJ
Böttcher, KA
Busch, R
Heidecke, CD
Siewert, JR
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Surg, Chirurgt Klin & Poliklin, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Surg, Inst Med Stat & Epidemiol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199901000-00005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare morbidity and mortality rates of stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Background Data Despite a marked reduction in the mortality rate after partial pancreatoduodenectomy in recent years, leakage of the pancreaticojejunostomy still occurs in 5% to 25% of patients and remains the major source of complications. Methods The authors compared the morbidity and mortality rates of 85 consecutive patients who had a partial pancreatoduodenectomy with (n = 44) or without (n = 41) temporary stented external drainage of the pancreatic duct between 1994 and 1997. Results A pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in 3 of the 44 patients (6.8%) with stents versus 12 of the 41 patients (29.3%) without stents. Surgical reintervention was necessary in 1 of the 3 patients with a pancreatic fistula in the stented group and 3 of the 12 patients with a pancreatic fistula in the nonstented group. There were two deaths after surgery, both in the nonstented group. The median hospital stay after surgery was 13 days in patients with stents and 29 clays in patients without stents. Conclusion In this nonrandomized prospective observational study, temporary external drainage of the pancreatic duct with a PVC tube significantly reduced the leakage rate of the pancreaticojejunostomy as well as the duration of hospital stay after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Although promising, these observations require confirmation by further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
BARTOLI FG, 1991, ANTICANCER RES, V11, P1831
[2]   IS STENTING NECESSARY FOR A SUCCESSFUL PANCREATIC ANASTOMOSIS [J].
BIEHL, T ;
TRAVERSO, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (05) :530-532
[3]   PYLORIC AND GASTRIC PRESERVING PANCREATIC RESECTION - EXPERIENCE WITH 87 PATIENTS [J].
BRAASCH, JW ;
DEZIEL, DJ ;
ROSSI, RL ;
WATKINS, E ;
WINTER, PF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1986, 204 (04) :411-418
[4]   ROLE OF OCTREOTIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PANCREATIC RESECTION [J].
BUCHLER, M ;
FRIESS, H ;
KLEMPA, I ;
HERMANEK, P ;
SULKOWSKI, U ;
BECKER, H ;
SCHAFMAYER, A ;
BACA, I ;
LORENZ, D ;
MEISTER, R ;
KREMER, B ;
WAGNER, P ;
WITTE, J ;
ZURMAYER, EL ;
SAEGER, HD ;
RIECK, B ;
DOLLINGER, P ;
GLASER, K ;
TEICHMANN, R ;
KONRADT, J ;
GAUS, W ;
DENNLER, HJ ;
WELZEL, D ;
BEGER, HG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (01) :125-131
[5]   100 AND 45 CONSECUTIVE PANCREATICODUODENECTOMIES WITHOUT MORTALITY [J].
CAMERON, JL ;
PITT, HA ;
YEO, CJ ;
LILLEMOE, KD ;
KAUFMAN, HS ;
COLEMAN, J ;
HERRINGTON, JL ;
MASON, GR ;
BRADLEY, EL ;
JORDAN, GL ;
GADACZ, TR ;
VANHEERDEN, JA ;
WATKINS, GH ;
COPELAND, EH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 217 (05) :430-438
[6]  
CRAIGHEAD CC, 1958, ANN SURG, V147, P931
[7]   IMPROVED HOSPITAL MORBIDITY, MORTALITY, AND SURVIVAL AFTER THE WHIPPLE PROCEDURE [J].
CRIST, DW ;
SITZMANN, JV ;
CAMERON, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1987, 206 (03) :358-365
[8]  
CRIST DW, 1989, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V36, P478
[9]  
CROWDER MJ, 1993, ANAL REPEATED MEASUR
[10]  
CUBILLA AL, 1978, CANCER, V41, P880, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<880::AID-CNCR2820410315>3.0.CO