Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups version III systems across post acute settings

被引:23
作者
Eilertsen, TB
Kramer, AM
Schlenker, RE
Hrincevich, CA
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Aging, Res Sect,Dept Geriatr Med, Denver, CO 80206 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Denver, CO 80206 USA
关键词
prospective payment system; cost and cost analysis; FIM-FRGs; RUG-III; rehabilitation; post acute care; rehabilitation facilities; skilled nursing facilities;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199805000-00009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The present study evaluated alternative patient classification systems for skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation facility patients. METHODS. Medicare patients were selected from a random sample of 27 rehabilitation facilities and 65 skilled nursing facilities participating in a national longitudinal study of subacute care. Detailed casemix and resource use data was obtained on 513 patients with hip fracture and 483 stroke patients. The Functional Independence Measure-Function Related Groups (FIM-FRGs) classification system for rehabilitation facilities was replicated on length of stay and tested on resource use for rehabilitation facility patients as well as for skilled nursing facility patients. Modifications to the FIM-FRGs also were tested. The Resource Utilization Groups-Version III classification was tested on rehabilitation facility patients. RESULTS. The FIM-FRGs explained the same amount of variance in length of stay as in the original FIM-FRGs development sample (R-2 hip fracture 0.14, R-2 stroke = 0.28), and similar variance in resource use, A modified version of the FIM-FRGs explained more variance in length of stay (R-2 hip fracture = 0.19, R-2 stroke = 0.39) and resource use (R2 hip fracture = 0.20, R2 stroke = 0.41.). Neither model adequately predicted length of stay or resource use in skilled nursing facility patients. The Resource Utilization Groups-Version III rehabilitation groups accounted for little variance in rehabilitation facility patients' per-diem resource use (R-2 = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS. The FIM-FRGs are valid for resource use as well as length of stay for rehabilitation facility patients, but are not valid for skilled nursing facility patients. Similarly, the Resource Utilization Groups-Version III system does not apply to rehabilitation facility patients. Related work, however, suggests that development of a single episode-based patient classification system for skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation facility patients is possible and should be pursued.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 705
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CARTER GM, 1996, PATIENT CLASSIFICATI
[2]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[3]   REFINING A CASE-MIX MEASURE FOR NURSING-HOMES - RESOURCE UTILIZATION GROUPS (RUG-III) [J].
FRIES, BE ;
SCHNEIDER, DP ;
FOLEY, WJ ;
GAVAZZI, M ;
BURKE, R ;
CORNELIUS, E .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (07) :668-685
[4]  
HRINCEVICH CA, 1994, STUDY COST EFFECTIVE
[5]   Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke - A comparison of rehabilitation settings [J].
Kramer, AM ;
Steiner, JF ;
Schlenker, RE ;
Eilertsen, TB ;
Hrincevich, CA ;
Tropea, DA ;
Ahmad, LA ;
Eckhoff, DG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (05) :396-404
[6]  
KRAMER AM, 1997, PATIENT CLASSIFICATI
[7]  
KRAMER AM, 1994, REHABILITATION MED P
[8]  
Schlenker RE, 1997, HEALTH SERV RES, V32, P651
[9]  
STEINER A, 1992, MONITORING CHANGES U
[10]   A CASE-MIX CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL REHABILITATION [J].
STINEMAN, MG ;
ESCARCE, JJ ;
GOIN, JE ;
HAMILTON, BB ;
GRANGER, CV ;
WILLIAMS, SV .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (04) :366-379