Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces

被引:106
作者
Prugh, LR
Ritland, CE
Arthur, SM
Krebs, CJ
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest Sci, Genet Data Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Alaska Dept Fish & Game, Fairbanks, AK 99701 USA
关键词
capture-mark-recapture; Cormack-Jolly Seber; coyote population dynamics; coyote; genetic tagging; non-invasive sampling; open-population models;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02533.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Reliable population estimates are necessary for effective conservation and management, and faecal genotyping has been used successfully to estimate the population size of several elusive mammalian species. Information such as changes in population size over time and survival rates, however, are often more useful for conservation biology than single population estimates. We evaluated the use of faecal genotyping as a tool for monitoring long-term population dynamics, using coyotes (Canis latrans) in the Alaska Range as a case study. We obtained 544 genotypes from 56 coyotes over 3 years (2000-2002). Tissue samples from all 15 radio-collared coyotes in our study area had >= 1 matching faecal genotypes. We used flexible maximum-likelihood models to study coyote population dynamics, and we tested model performance against radio telemetry data. The staple prey of coyotes, snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), dramatically declined during this study, and the coyote population declined nearly two-fold with a 1(1)/(2)-year time lag. Survival rates declined the year after hares crashed but recovered the following year. We conclude that long-term monitoring of elusive species using faecal genotyping is feasible and can provide data that are useful for wildlife conservation and management. We highlight some drawbacks of standard open-population models, such as low precision and the requirement of discrete sampling intervals, and we suggest that the development of open models designed for continuously collected data would enhance the utility of faecal genotyping as a monitoring tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1585 / 1596
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) [J].
Adams, JR ;
Kelly, BT ;
Waits, LP .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) :2175-2186
[2]   Bayesian methods for mark-resighting surveys [J].
Ananda, MMA .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1997, 26 (03) :685-697
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INTERRELATIONSHIPS D
[4]   Evaluation of closed capture-recapture methods to estimate abundance of Hawaiian monk seals [J].
Baker, JD .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (04) :987-998
[5]   Wombat coprogenetics: enumerating a common wombat population by microsatellite analysis of faecal DNA [J].
Banks, SC ;
Piggott, MP ;
Hansen, BD ;
Robinson, NA ;
Taylor, AC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2002, 50 (02) :193-204
[6]   How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies [J].
Bonin, A ;
Bellemain, E ;
Eidesen, PB ;
Pompanon, F ;
Brochmann, C ;
Taberlet, P .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (11) :3261-3273
[7]   Monitoring of grizzly bear population trends and demography using DNA mark-recapture methods in the Owikeno Lake area of British Columbia [J].
Boulanger, J ;
Himmer, S ;
Swan, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2004, 82 (08) :1267-1277
[8]   Closure violation in DNA-based mark-recapture estimation of grizzly bear populations [J].
Boulanger, J ;
McLellan, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 79 (04) :642-651
[9]  
Boulinier T, 1998, ECOLOGY, V79, P1018, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1018:ESRTIO]2.0.CO
[10]  
2