Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic oncology group study

被引:199
作者
Schilder, RJ
Sill, MW
Chen, XW
Darcy, KM
Decesare, SL
Lewandowski, G
Lee, RB
Arciero, CA
Wu, H
Godwin, AK
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Stat & Data Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[5] Tampa Bay Canc Consortium Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Pensacola, FL USA
[6] Mt Carmel Hlth Ctr, Columbus Canc Council, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Columbus, OH USA
[7] Tacoma Gen Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Tacoma, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0462
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose:This phase 11 trial assessed the activity and tolerability of a daily oral dose of 500 mg gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, and explored the clinical value of determining the status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Experimental Design: Primary measure of efficacy was progression-free survival at 6 months. Mutations in exons 18 to 21 of EGFR and/or immunohistochemical expression of EGFR were evaluated in tumor specimens from patients enrolled in this trial as well as from patients not treated with gefitinib. Results: Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of gefitinib efficacy and toxicity. Of these, four survived progression-free >6 months with one objective response (4%). The most commonly observed grade 3 toxicities were dermatologic (15%, 4 of 27) and diarrhea (30%, 8 of 27). Specimens from 26 of 26 or 25 of 26 patients were evaluable for immunohistochemical or mutation analysis, respectively, The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors was 9% (1 of 11). EGFR expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = 0.008) and possibly longer survival (P = 0.082). The patient with the only objective response had a mutation in the catalytic domain of the tumor's EGFR (P = 0.04). Among 32 invasive tumors from patients not treated with gefitinib, one exhibited a catalytic domain mutation. Conclusions: Gefitinib was well tolerated but had minimal activity in unscreened patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Prescreening patients for activating mutations in EGFR may improve response rate to gefitinib. This report is the first to document activating mutations in catalytic domain of EGFR in 3.5% (2 of 57) of ovarian cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:5539 / 5548
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Amann J, 2005, CANCER RES, V65, P226
[2]   ZD1839 (Iressa), a novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, potently inhibits the growth of EGFR-positive cancer cell lines with or without erbB2 overexpression [J].
Anderson, NG ;
Ahmad, T ;
Chan, K ;
Dobson, R ;
Bundred, NJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 94 (06) :774-782
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
[4]   The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression in primary ovarian cancer [J].
Bartlett, JMS ;
Langdon, SP ;
Simpson, BJB ;
Stewart, M ;
Katsaros, D ;
Sismondi, P ;
Love, S ;
Scott, WN ;
Williams, ARW ;
Lessells, AM ;
Macleod, KG ;
Smyth, JF ;
Miller, WR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (03) :301-306
[5]   ZD1839 ('Iressa')1,2 as an anticancer agent [J].
Baselga, J ;
Averbuch, SD .
DRUGS, 2000, 60 (Suppl 1) :33-40
[6]  
BASELGA J, 2000, DRUGS S1, V60, P1
[7]  
BASELGA J, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA177
[8]  
Chen TT, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2301, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981030)17:20<2301::AID-SIM927>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-X
[10]   Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry [J].
Chung, KY ;
Shia, J ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Shah, M ;
Schwartz, GK ;
Tse, A ;
Hamilton, A ;
Pan, D ;
Schrag, D ;
Schwartz, L ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Fridman, D ;
Kelsen, DP ;
Saltz, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (09) :1803-1810