Blood pressure reduction and cardiovascular prevention: An update including the 2003-2004 secondary prevention trials

被引:189
作者
Staessen, JA
Li, Y
Thijs, L
Wang, JG
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Lab Hypertensie, Studie Coordinatie Ctr, Hypertens & Cardiovasc Rehabil Unit,Dept Mol & Ca, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Shanghai Med Univ 2, Ctr Epidemiol Res & Clin Trails, Shanghai Inst Hypertens, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
blood pressure; clinical trial; heart failure; myocardial infarction; stroke;
D O I
10.1291/hypres.28.385
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
In a meta-analysis published in June 2003, we reported that new and old classes of anti hypertensive drugs had similar long-term efficacy and safety. Furthermore, we observed that in clinical trials in hypertensive or high-risk patients gradients in systolic blood pressure (SBP) accounted for most differences in outcome. To test whether our previous conclusions would hold, we updated our quantitative overview with new information from clinical trials published before 2005. To compare new and old anti hypertensive drugs, we computed pooled odds ratios from stratified 2 X 2 contingency tables. In a meta-regression analysis, we correlated these odds ratios with corresponding between-group differences in SBP. We then contrasted observed odds ratios with those predicted from gradients in SBP. The main finding of our overview was that reduction in SBP largely explained cardiovascular outcomes in the recently published actively controlled trials in hypertensive patients and in placebo-controlled secondary prevention trials. The published results suggested that dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers might offer a selective benefit in the prevention of stroke and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in the prevention of heart failure. For prevention of myocardial infarction, the published results were more equivocal, because of the benefit of amlodipine over placebo or valsartan in 2 trials, whereas other placebo-controlled trials of calcium-channel blockers or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors did not substantiate the expected benefit with regard to cardiac outcomes. In conclusion, the hypothesis that new anti hypertensive drugs might influence cardiovascular prognosis over and beyond their anti hypertensive effect remains unproven. Our overview emphasizes the need of tight blood pressure control, but does not allow determining to what extent blood pressure must be lowered for optimal cardiovascular prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 407
页数:23
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   PLASMA ACID-BASE PATTERNS IN DIABETIC-KETOACIDOSIS [J].
ADROGUE, HJ ;
WILSON, H ;
BOYD, AE ;
SUKI, WN ;
EKNOYAN, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307 (26) :1603-1610
[2]   Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Agodoa, LY ;
Appel, L ;
Bakris, GL ;
Beck, G ;
Bourgoignie, J ;
Briggs, JP ;
Charleston, J ;
Cheek, D ;
Cleveland, W ;
Douglas, JG ;
Douglas, M ;
Dowie, D ;
Faulkner, M ;
Gabriel, A ;
Gassman, J ;
Greene, T ;
Hall, Y ;
Hebert, L ;
Hiremath, L ;
Jamerson, K ;
Johnson, CJ ;
Kopple, J ;
Kusek, J ;
Lash, J ;
Lea, J ;
Lewis, JB ;
Lipkowitz, M ;
Massry, S ;
Middleton, J ;
Miller, ER ;
Norris, K ;
O'Connor, D ;
Ojo, A ;
Phillips, RA ;
Pogue, V ;
Rahman, M ;
Randall, OS ;
Rostand, S ;
Schulman, G ;
Smith, W ;
Thornley-Brown, D ;
Tisher, CC ;
Toto, RD ;
Wright, JT ;
Xu, SC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (21) :2719-2728
[3]   Diuretic versus α-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy -: Final results from the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT) [J].
Alderman, MH .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (03) :239-246
[4]  
*ALLHAT OFF COORD, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.288.23.2981
[5]  
AMERY A, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1349
[6]  
AMERY A, 1985, ARCH INT PHARMACOD T, V275, P300
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1991, JAMA, V265, P3255
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1974, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V229, P409
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1980, LANCET, V1, P1261
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1970, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V213, P1143, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.213.7.1143