Accuracy and clinical implications of seven 25-hydroxyvitamin D methods compared with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as a reference

被引:240
作者
Roth, Heinz Juergen [1 ]
Schmidt-Gayk, Heinrich [1 ]
Weber, Holger [2 ]
Niederau, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] Limbach Lab, Dept Endocrinol & Oncol, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Labor Prof G Enders & Partner, D-70193 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Labor Dr Niederau, D-44147 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1258/acb.2007.007091
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The most reliable assessment of vitamin ID status is measurement of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration. High variability in 25(OH)D measurements due to utilized test and assay technologies and the lack of standardization against reference materials and reference method often confounds proper assessment of vitamin ID status. Methods: We evaluated the accuracy of six routinely available methodologies: high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the IDS-radioimmunoassay (IDS-RIA) and enzyme immunoassay (IDS-EIA), the Nichols Advantage automated protein-binding assay (Advantage), two versions of the DiaSorin automated immunoassay (Liaison 1 and Liaison 2) - and one prototype automated immunoassay (Elecsys) for assessment of the 25(OH)D-3 status in a cohort of 300 randomly selected patients' samples compared with the reference method liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: Passing-Bablok regression analysis demonstrated a slope for each method compared with LC-MS/MS that varied from 0.62 (IDS-EIA) to 1.0 (HPLC). The Advantage and the Liaison 1 showed significant deviation from linearity with highly variable individual results vs. the LC-MS/MS. Difference plots revealed a considerable persistent proportional bias for the IDS-RIA and IDS-EIA. All evaluated methods except HPLC demonstrated a more or less considerable deviation of individual 25(OH)D-3 values compared with LC-MS/MS defined target concentrations. Conclusions: Standardization of methods for the quantification of 25(OH)D on a human-based sample panel by means of LC-MS/MS would help to reduce the inter-method variability with respect to accuracy existing in 25(OH)D measurement considerably. However, there will still remain differences in the accuracy of methods utilizing sample purification before final quantification or immunological reaction when compared with those methods without separate sample purification.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans [J].
Armas, LAG ;
Hollis, BW ;
Heaney, RP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (11) :5387-5391
[2]  
ARNAUD J, 1993, HUM GENET, V92, P183
[3]   Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: A call for standardization [J].
Binkley, N ;
Krueger, D ;
Cowgill, CS ;
Plum, L ;
Lake, E ;
Hansen, KE ;
DeLuca, HF ;
Drezner, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (07) :3152-3157
[4]  
BOUILLON R, 1984, CLIN CHEM, V30, P1731
[5]   How accurate are assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D? Data from the international vitamin D external quality assessment scheme [J].
Carter, GD ;
Carter, R ;
Jones, J ;
Berry, J .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (11) :2195-2197
[6]   Estimates of optimal vitamin D status [J].
Dawson-Hughes, B ;
Heaney, RP ;
Holick, MF ;
Lips, P ;
Meunier, PJ ;
Vieth, R .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (07) :713-716
[7]  
DORANTES LM, 1978, J LAB CLIN MED, V91, P791
[8]   Analytical and clinical validation of the 25 OH vitamin D assay for the LIAISON® automated analyzer [J].
Ersfeld, DL ;
Rao, DS ;
Body, JJ ;
Sackrison, JL ;
Miller, AB ;
Parikh, N ;
Eskridge, TL ;
Polinske, A ;
Olson, GT ;
MacFarlane, GD .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 37 (10) :867-874
[9]   Current assays overestimate 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and underestimate 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 compared with HPLC:: need for assay-specific decision limits and metabolite-specific assays [J].
Glendenning, P ;
Taranto, M ;
Noble, JM ;
Musk, AA ;
Hammond, C ;
Goldswain, PR ;
Fraser, WD ;
Vasikaran, SD .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 43 :23-30
[10]   Editorial: The determination of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D: No easy task [J].
Hollis, BW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (07) :3149-3151