Topological susceptibility with the improved Asqtad action

被引:29
作者
Bernard, C [1 ]
DeGrand, T
Hasenfratz, A
DeTar, C
Osborn, J
Gottlieb, S
Gregory, E
Toussaint, D
Hart, A
Heller, UM
Hetrick, J
Sugar, RL
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Phys, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Phys, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Phys, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Phys, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[6] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Phys, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] Amer Phys Soc, Ridge, NY 11961 USA
[8] Univ Pacific, Dept Phys, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
[9] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Phys, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.68.114501
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Chiral perturbation theory predicts that in quantum chromodynamics light dynamical quarks suppress the topological (instanton) susceptibility. We investigate this suppression through direct numerical simulation using the Asqtad improved lattice fermion action. This action holds promise for carrying out nonperturbative simulations over a range of quark masses for which chiral perturbation theory is expected to converge. To test the effectiveness of the action in capturing instanton physics, we measure the topological susceptibility as a function of quark masses with 2+1 dynamical flavors. Our results, when extrapolated to zero lattice spacing, are consistent with predictions of leading order chiral perturbation theory. Included in our study is a comparison of three methods for analyzing the topological susceptibility: (1) the Boulder hypercubic blocking technique with the Boulder topological charge operator, (2) the more traditional Wilson cooling method with the twisted plaquette topological charge operator and (3) the improved cooling method of de Forcrand, Perez, and Stamatescu and their improved topological charge operator. We show in one comparison at nonzero lattice spacing that the largest difference between methods (1) and (2) can be attributed to the operator, rather than the smoothing method.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   Topological susceptibility in full QCD:: lattice results versus the prediction from the QCD partition function with granularity [J].
Dürr, S .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2001, 611 (1-3) :281-310
[22]  
DURR S, 2003, COMMUNICATION
[23]   AGAIN ON SU(3) GLUEBALL MASS [J].
FALCIONI, M ;
PACIELLO, ML ;
PARISI, G ;
TAGLIENTI, B .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1985, 251 (04) :624-632
[24]   AXIAL SYMMETRIES IN LATTICE QCD WITH KAPLAN FERMIONS [J].
FURMAN, V ;
SHAMIR, Y .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1995, 439 (1-2) :54-78
[25]   Glueballs and topology with O(a)-improved lattice QCD [J].
Hart, A .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2002, 106 :575-577
[26]   The topological susceptibility and fπ from lattice QCD [J].
Hart, A ;
Teper, M .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2001, 523 (3-4) :280-292
[27]  
HART A, HEPPH0004180
[28]   Flavor symmetry and the static potential with hypercubic blocking [J].
Hasenfratz, A ;
Knechtli, F .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2001, 64 (03)
[29]   Instanton content of the SU(3) vacuum [J].
Hasenfratz, A ;
Nieter, C .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1998, 439 (3-4) :366-372
[30]   Simulation of dynamical fermions with smeared links [J].
Hasenfratz, A ;
Knechtli, F .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 148 (01) :81-86