Form versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences

被引:279
作者
Chitturi, Ravindra [1 ]
Raghunathan, Rajagopal
Mahajan, Vijay
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Red McCombs Sch Business, John P Harbin Centennial Chair Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.44.4.702
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the emotional and behavioral consequences of making functional versus hedonic.trade-offs. Building on the proposed correspondence between functionality and a prevention focus and between hedonics and a promotion focus, the authors predict that contexts involving functional versus hedonic trade-offs evoke a variety of both negative and positive emotions, including guilt/anxiety, sadness/ disappointment, cheerfulness/excitement, and confidence/security. These predictions are confirmed. Furthermore, an analysis of the intensities of these specific emotions reveals the following additional insights: (1) Under conditions in which the options in a choice set meet or exceed both functional and hedonic cutoffs, consumers attach greater importance to the hedonic attribute, and (2) whereas the functionally superior option is preferred in choice tasks, the hedonically superior one is preferred in willingness-to-pay tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 714
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]  
Berry C.J., 1994, IDEA LUXURY
[3]   Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement [J].
Bloch, PH ;
Brunel, FF ;
Arnold, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (04) :551-565
[4]   Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? [J].
Brendl, CM ;
Higgins, ET .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 28 :95-160
[5]   Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice [J].
Chernev, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (1-2) :141-150
[6]  
Higgins E.T., 2001, WELL BEING FDN HEDON, P230
[7]  
Higgins E. T., 1989, Advances in experimental social psychology, V22, P93, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60306-8, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60306-8, 10.1016/S0065-2601]
[8]   Beyond pleasure and pain [J].
Higgins, ET .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (12) :1280-1300
[9]  
Higgins ET, 2001, HANDBOOK OF AFFECT AND SOCIAL COGNITION, P186
[10]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257