Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:312
作者
Gates, S. [1 ]
Fisher, J. D. [1 ]
Cooke, M. W. [1 ]
Carter, Y. H. [1 ]
Lamb, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Kadoorie Crit Care Res Ctr, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2008年 / 336卷 / 7636期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39412.525243.BE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of multifactorial assessment and intervention programmes to prevent falls and injuries among older adults recruited to trials in primary care, community, or emergency care settings. Design Systematic review of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, and meta-analysis Data sources Six databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index) to 22 March 2007, reference lists of included studies, and previous reviews. Review methods Eligible studies were randomised or quasi-randomised trials that evaluated interventions to prevent falls that were based in emergency departments, primary care, or the community, that assessed multiple risk factors for falling and provided or arranged for treatments to address these risk factors. Data extraction Outcomes were number of falters, fall related injuries, fall rate, death, admission to hospital, contacts with health services, move to institutional care, physical activity, and quality of life. Methodological quality assessment included allocation concealment, blinding, tosses and exclusions, intention to treat analysis, and reliability of outcome measurement. Results 19 studies, of variable methodological quality, were included. The combined risk ratio for the number of falters during follow-up among 18 trials was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.02) and for fall. related injuries (eight trials) was 0.90 (0.68 to 1.20). No differences were found in admissions to hospital, emergency department attendance, death, or move to institutional care. Subgroup analyses found no evidence of different effects between interventions in different locations, populations selected for high risk of falls or unselected, and multidisciplinary teams including a doctor, but interventions that actively provide treatments may be more effective than those that provide only knowledge and referral. Conclusions Evidence that multifactorial fall prevention programmes in primary care community or emergency care settings are effective in reducing the number of falters or fall related injuries is limited. Data were insufficient to assess fall and injury rates.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials [J].
Chang, JT ;
Morton, SC ;
Rubenstein, LZ ;
Mojica, WA ;
Maglione, M ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
Roth, EA ;
Shekelle, PG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :680-683
[3]  
Deeks J.J., 2006, The Cochrane Library, V4, P345
[4]  
Deeks JJ., 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, V2nd ed, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926.CH15
[5]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[6]  
DOH, 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[7]   Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials [J].
Hauer, K ;
Lamb, SE ;
Jorstad, EC ;
Todd, C ;
Becker, C .
AGE AND AGEING, 2006, 35 (01) :5-10
[8]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[9]   A meta-analysis of fall prevention programs for the elderly - How effective are they? [J].
Hill-Westmoreland, EE ;
Soeken, K ;
Spellbring, AM .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (01) :1-8
[10]  
HOPEWELL S, 2004, 12 COCHR C BRIDG GAP