Progressive behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine challenge: Further evidence for sensitization in humans

被引:105
作者
Strakowski, SM [1 ]
Sax, KW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Psychot Disorders Res Program, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
behavioral sensitization; normal human volunteers; d-amphetamine; eye-blink rate; increased activity; placebo-controlled double-blind trial;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00454-X
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Behavioural sensitization is the process whereby intermittent stimulant exposure produces a time-dependent, enduring, and progressive behavioral response. Although animal models of sensitization are well established the phenomenon has been relatively little studied iii humans. In a previous study, we reported enhanced responses following a second as compared to a first amphetamine dose in eye-blink rate and ratings of increased motor activity/energy, increased speech, and elevated mood in normal human volunteers. This current study extends those findings in a new sample of normal volunteers. Methods: Eleven normal human volunteers were administered three single oral doses of d-amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg) at 48-hour intervals, alternating with matched placebo in a randomized double-blind trial. Hourly behavioral ratings included eye-blink I-cite, symptoms (elevated mood, increased speech, increased motor activity/energy energy), and subjective drug effects. Results: Eye-blink rate and increased motor activity/ energy ratings progressively increased following each challenge with the third amphetamine close response significantly greater than all other conditions 4 hours postadministration. Similar although less pronounced, responses were observed for elevated mood and subjective drug effect, Conclusions: These results provide further evidence for sensitization of some amphetamine-induced behaviors in human subjects. (C) 1998 Society of Biological Psychiatry.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1177
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EARLY PHARMACOKINETICS AND CLINICAL EFFECTS OF ORAL D-AMPHETAMINE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
ANGRIST, B ;
CORWIN, J ;
BARTLIK, B ;
COOPER, T .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 22 (11) :1357-1368
[2]   ONE EXPERIENCE WITH LOWER OR HIGHER INTENSITY STRESSORS, RESPECTIVELY ENHANCES OR DIMINISHES RESPONSIVENESS TO HALOPERIDOL WEEKS LATER - IMPLICATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING DRUG VARIABILITY [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
CAGGIULA, AR ;
KOCAN, D ;
KNOPF, S ;
MEYER, D ;
EDWARDS, DJ ;
BARRY, H .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 566 (1-2) :276-283
[3]   INTERCHANGEABILITY OF STRESS AND AMPHETAMINE IN SENSITIZATION [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
EICHLER, AJ ;
BLACK, CA ;
KOCAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4428) :329-331
[4]   ANTICONVULSANT AND OTHER EFFECTS OF DIAZEPAM GROW WITH TIME AFTER A SINGLE TREATMENT [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
KOCAN, D ;
EDWARDS, DJ ;
KNOPF, S .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1989, 33 (01) :31-39
[5]   Selective sensitization to the psychosis-inducing effects of cocaine: A possible marker for addiction relapse vulnerability? [J].
Bartlett, E ;
Hallin, A ;
Chapman, B ;
Angrist, B .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) :77-82
[6]  
BELL DS, 1973, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V29, P35
[7]  
BRADY KT, 1991, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V52, P509
[8]  
GOLDBERG TE, 1991, AM J PSYCHIAT, V148, P78
[10]   SPONTANEOUS EYE-BLINK RATES AND DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEMS [J].
KARSON, CN .
BRAIN, 1983, 106 (SEP) :643-653