What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations

被引:23
作者
Harrison, David A. [1 ]
Klein, Katherine J.
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on organizational diversity, heterogeneity, and related concepts has proliferated in the past decade, but few consistent findings have emerged. We argue that the construct of diversity requires closer examination. We describe three distinctive types of diversity: separation, variety, and disparity. Failure to recognize the meaning, maximum shape, and assumptions underlying each type has held back theory development and yielded ambiguous research conclusions. We present guidelines for conceptualization, measurement. and theory testing. highlighting the special case of demographic diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1228
页数:30
相关论文
共 170 条
[1]   TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY [J].
ADAMS, JS .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (05) :422-&
[2]  
Agresti A., 1978, Sociological Methodology, V9, P204, DOI [10.2307/270810, DOI 10.2307/270810]
[3]   STUDYING INTER-GROUP RELATIONS EMBEDDED IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
ALDERFER, CP ;
SMITH, KK .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (01) :35-65
[4]   MEASURES OF INEQUALITY [J].
ALLISON, PD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (06) :865-880
[5]   DEMOGRAPHY AND DESIGN - PREDICTORS OF NEW PRODUCT TEAM PERFORMANCE [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :321-341
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1961, ACQUAINTANCE PROCESS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1950, CONCENTRATION US STE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMMUN MONOGR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1961, SOCIAL BEHAV ELEMENT
[10]  
[Anonymous], ORG SCI