A prediction model to identify patients without a concerning intraabdominal diagnosis

被引:4
作者
Aaronson, Emily L. [1 ]
Chang, Yuchiao [2 ]
Borczuk, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
CLINICAL DECISION RULE; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; ACUTE APPENDICITIS; CHILDREN; QUALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2016.03.063
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Objective: Patients with abdominal diagnoses constitute 5% to 10% of all emergency department (ED) presentations. The goal of this study is to identify which of these patients will have a nonconcerning diagnosis based on demographic, physical examination, and basic laboratory testing. Methods: Consecutive patients from July 2013 to March 2014 discharged with a gastrointestinal (GI) diagnosis who presented to an urban, university-affiliated ED were identified. The cohort was split into a derivation set and a validation set. Using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, a risk score was created based on the deviation data and then tested on the validation data. Results: There were 8852 patients with a GI diagnosis during the study period. A total of 7747 (87.5%) of them had a nonconcerning diagnosis. The logistic regression model identified 13 variables that predict a concerning GI diagnosis and created a scoring system ranging from 0 to 20. The area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.81. When dichotomized at greater than or equal to 7 vs less than 7, the risk score has a sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88-94), specificity of 46% (95% CI, 44-48), positive predictive value of 17% (95% CI, 15-19) and negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI, 97-99). Conclusion: One can determine with a high degree of certainty, based only on an initial evaluation and screening laboratory work (excluding radiology) whether a patient who presents with a GI-related complaint has a nonconcerning diagnosis. This model could be used as a tool to aid in quality assurance when reviewing patients discharged with GI complaints and with future study, as a secondary triage instrument in a crowded ED environment, and aid in resource allocation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1358
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
THE PREVALENCE OF QUALITY ISSUES AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES AMONG 72-HOUR RETURN ADMISSIONS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
Abualenain, Jameel ;
Frohna, William J. ;
Smith, Mark ;
Pipkin, Michael ;
Webb, Cynthia ;
Milzman, David ;
Pines, Jesse M. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (02) :281-287
[2]
COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
ADAMS, ID ;
CHAN, M ;
CLIFFORD, PC ;
COOKE, WM ;
DALLOS, V ;
DEDOMBAL, FT ;
EDWARDS, MH ;
HANCOCK, DM ;
HEWETT, DJ ;
MCINTYRE, N ;
SOMERVILLE, PG ;
SPIEGELHALTER, DJ ;
WELLWOOD, J ;
WILSON, DH .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6550) :800-804
[3]
[Anonymous], 1994, Ann Emerg Med, V23, P906
[4]
Emergency Department Computed Tomography Utilization in the United States and Canada [J].
Berdahl, Carl T. ;
Vermeulen, Marian J. ;
Larson, David B. ;
Schull, Michael J. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 62 (05) :486-494
[5]
ABDOMINAL-PAIN - ANALYSIS OF 1,000 CONSECUTIVE CASES IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM [J].
BREWER, RJ ;
GOLDEN, GT ;
HITCH, DC ;
RUDOLF, LE ;
WANGENSTEEN, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 131 (02) :219-223
[6]
ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN IN THE ELDERLY [J].
BUGLIOSI, TF ;
MELOY, TD ;
VUKOV, LF .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (12) :1383-1386
[7]
Chanana Lakshay, 2015, J Family Med Prim Care, V4, P422, DOI 10.4103/2249-4863.161344
[8]
The characteristics and prognostic predictors of unplanned hospital admission within 72 hours after ED discharge [J].
Cheng, Shih-Yu ;
Wang, Hui-Ting ;
Lee, Chi-Wei ;
Tsai, Tsung-Cheng ;
Hung, Chi-Wei ;
Wu, Kuan-Han .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 31 (10) :1490-1494
[9]
Evidence-based paramedic models of care to reduce unnecessary emergency department attendance - feasibility and safety [J].
Finn J.C. ;
Fatovich D.M. ;
Arendts G. ;
Mountain D. ;
Tohira H. ;
Williams T.A. ;
Sprivulis P. ;
Celenza A. ;
Ahern T. ;
Bremner A.P. ;
Cameron P. ;
Borland M.L. ;
Rogers I.R. ;
Jacobs I.G. .
BMC Emergency Medicine, 13 (1)
[10]
Factors associated with longer ED lengths of stay [J].
Gardner, Rebekah L. ;
Sarkar, Urmimala ;
Maselli, Judith H. ;
Gonzales, Ralph .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 25 (06) :643-650