Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries

被引:62
作者
Orlewska, Ewa [16 ]
Ancuta, Ioan [1 ]
Anic, Branimir [2 ]
Codrenau, Catalin [3 ]
Damjanov, Nemanja [4 ]
Djukic, Predrag [5 ]
Ionescu, Ruxandra [6 ]
Marinchev, Lubomir [7 ]
Nasonov, Evgeny L. [8 ]
Peets, Tonu [9 ]
Praprotnik, Sonja [10 ]
Rashkov, Rasho [7 ]
Skoupa, Jana [11 ]
Tlustochowicz, Witold [12 ]
Tlustochowicz, Malgorzata [13 ]
Tomsic, Matija [10 ]
Veldi, Tiina [13 ]
Vojinovic, Jelena [14 ]
Wiland, Piotr [15 ]
机构
[1] Clin Inst Ion Catacuzino, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Clin Hosp Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Method Rheumatol Ctr Prof Dr Ion Stoia, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Inst Rheumatol, Beograd, Serbia
[5] Consultant Hlth Econ & Management, Beograd, Serbia
[6] Univ Med, St Maria UMF Carol Davila Hosp, Bucharest, Romania
[7] Univ Hosp St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
[8] RAMS, Inst Rheumatol, Moscow, Russia
[9] E Tallinn Cent Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Tallinn, Estonia
[10] Univ Med Ctr, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[11] Pharma Projects Sro, Prague, Czech Republic
[12] Mil Med Inst, Warsaw, Poland
[13] E Tallin Cent Hosp, Tallinn, Estonia
[14] Klinieki Ctr Nis, Nish, Serbia
[15] Med Univ Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
[16] Ctr Pharmacoecon, Warsaw, Poland
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2011年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; biologic treatment; guideline; health services accessibility; DIRECT COSTS;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.881697
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare patients' access to biologic anti-RA drugs in selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries and to analyze the determinants of differences between countries. Material/ Methods: This is a multi-country survey study, based on a combination of desk research and direct contact with national RA stakeholders. Data was collected using a pre-defined questionnaire. Affordability was measured using an affordability index, calculated comparing the index of health care expenditures to the price index, using Poland as an index of 1. Results: The percentage of patients on biologic treatment in 2009 was highest in Hungary (5% RA patients on biologic treatment), followed by Slovenia (4.5%), Slovakia (3.5%), Czech Republic (2.92%), Romania (2.2%), Estonia (1.8%), and Croatia, Serbia, Poland (below 1.5%). Infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and rituximab were included in the reimbursement system in all countries, but abatacept and tocilizumab were included only in Slovakia. In Slovenia, public payer covered 75% of the price, and 25% is covered by supplementary health insurance; in Bulgaria public payer covered 50% of etanercept and adalimumab costs, and 75% of rituximab cost. In other countries, biologic drugs are reimbursed at 100%. Affordability index for biologic drugs was the lowest in Slovenia (0.4). In each country national guidelines define which patients are eligible for biologic treatment. Disease Activity Score (DAS28) of over 5.1 and failure of 2 or more disease-modifying anti-RA drugs, including methotrexate, are commonly used criteria. Conclusions: The most important factors limiting access to biologic anti-RA treatment in the CEE region are macroeconomic conditions and restrictive treatment guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:SR1 / SR13
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
ANSUTA I, 2009, MANAGEMENT HLTH, V3, P7
[2]
BECVAR R, 2007, CES REVMATOL, V15, P73
[3]
BRODSZKY V, 2008, FARMAKOEKONOMIKA, V12, P10
[4]
BRODSZKY V, 2007, EC EVALUATION 1 TNF
[5]
BRODSZKY V, 2007, ABATACEPT TREATMENT
[6]
Curkovic Bozidar, 2007, Reumatizam, V54, P16
[7]
Biologic Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis [J].
Damjanov, Nemanja ;
Vojinovic, Jelena .
SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2009, 137 (3-4) :205-210
[8]
EDEJER TTT, 2003, CHOOSING INTERVENTIO
[9]
Guillemin F, 2004, J RHEUMATOL, V31, P1297
[10]
Hanova P, 2006, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V24, P499