Multidimensional anxiety and content-specificity effects in preferential processing of threat

被引:14
作者
Calvo, MG
Avero, P
Castillo, MD
Miguel-Tobal, JJ
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Dept Psicol Cognit, Tenerife 38205, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
anxiety; multidimensional; attentional bias; interpretative bias; memory bias;
D O I
10.1027//1016-9040.8.4.252
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examined the relative contribution of specific components of multidimensional anxiety to cognitive biases in the processing of threat-related information in three experiments. Attentional bias was assessed by the emotional Stroop word color-naming task, interpretative bias by an on-line inference processing task, and explicit memory bias by sensitivity W) and response criterion (P) from word-recognition scores. Multiple regression analyses revealed, first, that phobic anxiety and evaluative anxiety predicted selective attention to physical- and ego-threat information, respectively; cognitive anxiety predicted selective attention to both types of threat. Second, phobic anxiety predicted inhibition of inferences related to physically threatening outcomes of ambiguous situations, And, third, evaluative anxiety predicted a response bias, rather than a genuine memory bias, in the reporting of presented and nonpresented ego-threat information. Other anxiety components, such as motor and physiological anxiety or interpersonal and daily-routines anxiety made no specific contribution to any cognitive bias. Multidimensional anxiety measures are useful for detecting content-specificity effects in cognitive biases.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 265
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia [J].
Amir, N ;
Foa, EB ;
Coles, ME .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 107 (02) :285-290
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB COGNITION EMOTIO
[4]   The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: structure and content re-examined [J].
Bieling, PJ ;
Antony, MM ;
Swinson, RP .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1998, 36 (7-8) :777-788
[5]   Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Mogg, K ;
Falla, SJ ;
Hamilton, LR .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (06) :737-753
[6]   IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY FOR EMOTIONAL INFORMATION IN NONCLINICAL SUBJECTS [J].
BRADLEY, BP ;
MOGG, K ;
WILLIAMS, R .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1994, 32 (01) :65-78
[7]   TRAIT ANXIETY, ANXIOUS MOOD, AND THREAT DETECTION [J].
BYRNE, A ;
EYSENCK, MW .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1995, 9 (06) :549-562
[8]   The Nature of Trait Anxiety: Cognitive and Biological Vulnerability [J].
Calvo, Manuel G. ;
Cano-Vindel, Antonio .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 2 (04) :301-312
[9]   Early vigilance and late avoidance of threat processing: Repressive coping versus low/high anxiety [J].
Calvo, MG ;
Eysenck, MW .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2000, 14 (06) :763-787
[10]   The anxiety response: Concordance among components [J].
Calvo, MG ;
Miguel-Tobal, JJ .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 1998, 22 (03) :211-230