Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

被引:191
作者
Boussageon, Remy [1 ]
Supper, Irene [1 ]
Bejan-Angoulvant, Theodora [2 ,3 ]
Kellou, Nadir [1 ]
Cucherat, Michel [4 ]
Boissel, Jean-Pierre [4 ]
Kassai, Behrouz [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Moreau, Alain [1 ]
Gueyffier, Francois [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Cornu, Catherine [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Dept Gen Med, F-69365 Lyon, France
[2] CHR Univ Tours, Serv Pharmacol Clin, Tours, France
[3] Univ Tours, CNRS, UMR 7292, Tours, France
[4] CNRS, UMR 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, Villeurbanne, France
[5] INSERM, CIC201, Clin Invest Ctr, F-69008 Lyon, France
[6] Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Lyon, France
关键词
ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; COMBINATION THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; INCREASED RISK; HEART-FAILURE; INSULIN; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; ROSIGLITAZONE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sulphonylurea bitherapy may increase mortality. Methods and Findings: This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated metformin efficacy (in studies of metformin versus diet alone, versus placebo, and versus no treatment; metformin as an add-on therapy; and metformin withdrawal) against cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Primary end points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary end points included all myocardial infarctions, all strokes, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputations, and microvascular complications. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (13,110 patients) were retrieved; 9,560 patients were given metformin, and 3,550 patients were given conventional treatment or placebo. Metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes all-cause mortality, risk ratio (RR) = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.31), and cardiovascular mortality, RR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.64). The secondary outcomes were also unaffected by metformin treatment: all myocardial infarctions, RR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.09); all strokes, RR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.14); heart failure, RR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.59); peripheral vascular disease, RR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.78); leg amputations, RR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.44); and microvascular complications, RR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.17). For all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, there was significant heterogeneity when including the UK Prospective Diabetes Study subgroups (I-2 = 41% and 59%). There was significant interaction with sulphonylurea as a concomitant treatment for myocardial infarction (p = 0.10 and 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Although metformin is considered the gold standard, its benefit/risk ratio remains uncertain. We cannot exclude a 25% reduction or a 31% increase in all-cause mortality. We cannot exclude a 33% reduction or a 64% increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify this situation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Metformin treatment is associated with a low risk of mortality in diabetic patients with heart failure: a retrospective nationwide cohort study
    Andersson, C.
    Olesen, J. B.
    Hansen, P. R.
    Weeke, P.
    Norgaard, M. L.
    Jorgensen, C. H.
    Lange, T.
    Abildstrom, S. Z.
    Schramm, T. K.
    Vaag, A.
    Kober, L.
    Torp-Pedersen, C.
    Gislason, G. H.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53 (12) : 2546 - 2553
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1975, DIABETES, V24, P65
  • [3] [Anonymous], TYP 2 DIAB MAN TYP 2
  • [4] Combination therapy with sulfonylureas and metformin and the prevention of death in type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study
    Azoulay, Laurent
    Schneider-Lindner, Verena
    Dell'Aniello, Sophie
    Schiffrin, Alicia
    Suissa, Samy
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (04) : 335 - 342
  • [5] Drug therapy - Metformin
    Bailey, CJ
    Turner, RC
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (09) : 574 - 579
  • [6] Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Medications for Type 2 Diabetes: An Update Including New Drugs and 2-Drug Combinations
    Bennett, Wendy L.
    Maruthur, Nisa M.
    Singh, Sonal
    Segal, Jodi B.
    Wilson, Lisa M.
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Marinopoulos, Spyridon S.
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Ranasinghe, Padmini
    Block, Lauren
    Nicholson, Wanda K.
    Hutfless, Susan
    Bass, Eric B.
    Bolen, Shari
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (09) : 602 - 613
  • [7] Glyburide/metformin combination product is safe and efficacious in patients with type 2 diabetes failing sulphonylurea therapy
    Blonde, L
    Rosenstock, J
    Mooradian, AD
    Piper, BA
    Henry, D
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2002, 4 (06) : 368 - 375
  • [8] Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who use sulforrylureas or insulin
    Bowker, SL
    Majumdar, SR
    Veugelers, P
    Johnson, JA
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (02) : 254 - 258
  • [9] The synergistic effect of miglitol plus metformin combination therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Chiasson, JL
    Naditch, L
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (06) : 989 - 994
  • [10] Comparative outcomes study of metformin intervention versus conventional approach - The COSMIC approach study
    Cryer, DR
    Nicholas, SP
    Henry, DH
    Mills, DJ
    Stadel, BV
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (03) : 539 - 543