The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation

被引:42
作者
Duffy, SW
Tabar, L
Vitak, B
Yen, MF
Warwick, J
Smith, RA
Chen, HH
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, London, England
[2] Falun Cent Hosp, Falun, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Amer Canc Soc, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Prevent Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
breast screening; mammography; randomised trial;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg322
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The Swedish Two-County Trial has been criticised on the grounds of the cluster randomisation and alleged bias in classification of cause of death. Patients and methods: In the Two-County Trial, 77080 women were randomised to regular invitation to screening (active study population, ASP) and 55985 to no invitation (passive study population, PSP), in 45 geographical clusters. After similar to7 years, the PSP was invited to screening and the trial closed. We analysed data using hierarchical statistical models to take account of cluster randomisation, and performed a conservative analysis assuming a systematic difference between ASP and PSP in baseline breast cancer mortality in one of the counties. We also analysed deaths from causes other than breast cancer and from all causes among breast cancer cases diagnosed in the ASP and PSP. Results: Taking account of the cluster randomisation there was a significant 30% reduction in breast cancer mortality in the ASP. Conservatively, assuming a systematic difference between ASP and PSP clusters in baseline breast cancer mortality, there was a significant 27% reduction in mortality in the ASP. Ignoring classification of cause of death, there was a significant 13% reduction in all-cause mortality in breast cancer cases in the ASP. Conclusions: Breast cancer mortality is a valid end point and mammographic screening does indeed reduce mortality from breast cancer. The criticisms of the Swedish Two-County Trial are unfounded.
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1198
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Black WC, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P167, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167
[2]   The mammographic screening trials:: Commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche [J].
Duffy, SW ;
Tabár, L ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (02) :68-71
[3]   Interpretation of the breast screening trials: a commentary on the recent paper by Gotzsche and Olsen [J].
Duffy, SW .
BREAST, 2001, 10 (03) :209-212
[4]   Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? [J].
Gotzsche, PC ;
Olsen, O .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9198) :129-134
[5]  
Larsson L G, 1996, J Med Screen, V3, P129
[6]  
Nixon R, 2000, J Epidemiol Biostat, V5, P349
[7]   Long-term effects of mammography screening:: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials [J].
Nyström, L ;
Andersson, I ;
Bjurstam, N ;
Frisell, J ;
Nordenskjöld, B ;
Rutqvist, LE .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9310) :909-919
[8]   BREAST-CANCER SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY - OVERVIEW OF SWEDISH RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
NYSTROM, L ;
RUTQVIST, LE ;
WALL, S ;
LINDGREN, A ;
LINDQVIST, M ;
RYDEN, S ;
ANDERSSON, I ;
BJURSTAM, N ;
FAGERBERG, G ;
FRISELL, J ;
TABAR, L ;
LARSSON, LG .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8851) :973-978
[9]   Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography [J].
Olsen, O ;
Gotzsche, PC .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9290) :1340-1342
[10]   The Swedish two-county trial twenty years later -: Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up [J].
Tabár, L ;
Vitak, B ;
Chen, HH ;
Duffy, SW ;
Yen, MF ;
Chiang, CF ;
Krusemo, UB ;
Tot, T ;
Smith, RA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) :625-+