Evaluation and analysis of a dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model under preindustrial conditions at the global scale

被引:43
作者
Friend, AD
White, A
机构
[1] Inst Terr Ecol, Edinburgh Res Stn, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1999GB900085
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ability of a mechanistically based dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model, Hybrid nu4.1, to predict the global distribution of vegetation, primary productivity, biomass carbon, and soil carbon under preindustrial conditions of climate, atmospheric CO2, and nitrogen deposition is evaluated. This model predicts the dynamic global distribution of eight Plant Functional Types (PFTs) by treating the interactions between individual trees, an herbaceous layer, and their physical environment at independent points on the land surface. Carbon, water, and nitrogen flows are simulated on a daily, or subdaily, basis resulting in dynamic predictions of productivity, biomass, and plant and soil carbon and nitrogen contents. Hybrid nu4.1 successfully predicts the major global patterns of preindustrial vegetation, primary productivity, biomass carbon, and soil carbon. When not subject to competition, single PFTs have much broader distributions across climatic gradients than when allowed to compete with one another, demonstrating the importance of competition in determining vegetation distribution. Trade-offs between the avoidance of frost and drought damage, growing season length, and foliage nitrogen allocation determine the relative performance of tree PFTs along climatic gradients. Six areas of disagreement between prediction and reality are noted: (1) African savanna, (2) South American grassland, (3) an area of desert in Amazonia, (4) Southern Chinese evergreen forest, (5) Siberian larch forest, and (6) tundra. These discrepancies provide useful information for future model development.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1190
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, VEGETATION EARTH ECO
[2]  
[Anonymous], TRACE ATMOSPHERIC CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Plant functional types
[4]  
Ball J. T., 1987, PROGR PHOTOSYNTHESIS, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48, 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48]
[5]  
Bonan GordonB., 1996, Land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description and users guide. Technical note. Technical report
[6]   SOME ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A COMPUTER MODEL OF FOREST GROWTH [J].
BOTKIN, DB ;
WALLIS, JR ;
JANAK, JF .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1972, 60 (03) :849-&
[7]  
Brady N. C., 1984, The nature and properties of soils.
[8]  
Burns RC, 1975, NITROGEN FIXATION BA, V21
[9]   WOODY BIOMASS OF FOREST STANDS [J].
CANNELL, MGR .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1984, 8 (3-4) :299-312
[10]   COUPLED PHOTOSYNTHESIS-STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE MODEL FOR LEAVES OF C4 PLANTS [J].
COLLATZ, GJ ;
RIBAS-CARBO, M ;
BERRY, JA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 19 (05) :519-538