A cystatin C-based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula

被引:111
作者
Grubb, A [1 ]
Bjork, J
Lindström, V
Sterner, G
Bondesson, P
Nyman, U
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Hosp, Competence Ctr Clin Res, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Transplantat, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[5] Dept Radiol, Trelleborg, Sweden
关键词
kidney disease;
D O I
10.1080/00365510510013596
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In 1976, Cockcroft and Gault introduced a widely used formula comprising several anthropometric variables to compensate for the inadequacies of creatinine level as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The present work investigates the possibility of introducing cystatin C-based formulas without anthropometric variables to predict GFR, determined by an invasive "gold standard" procedure (iohexol clearance), and to compare the diagnostic efficiency of such formulas with that of Cockcroft and Gault. All 451 adult patients referred to the University Hospital for determination of GFR by iohexol clearance measurements during a period of 6 months were included in the study. Calculations of bias (median percent error), correlation (adjusted R-2), and accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30 and 50% of iohexol clearance) were used in the comparison. The cystatin C-based formula GFR (ml/min) = 89.12 x cystatin C-1.675 had lower bias and higher accuracy in predicting GFR than the Cockcroft-Gault formula. If a cystatin C-based formula including gender was constructed: GFR (ml/min) = 99.19 x cystatin C-1.713 x (0.823 for women), an even lower bias and higher accuracy were obtained. It is suggested that measurement of cystatin C should be used for the initial prediction of GFR of a patient.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   CONTRAST-MEDIA AS MARKERS FOR GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION - A PHARMACOKINETIC COMPARISON OF 4 AGENTS [J].
BACK, SE ;
KRUTZEN, E ;
NILSSONEHLE, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1988, 48 (03) :247-253
[2]   Prevalence of low glomerular filtration rate in nondiabetic Americans: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) [J].
Clase, CM ;
Garg, AX ;
Kiberd, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) :1338-1349
[3]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[4]   Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta-analysis [J].
Dharnidharka, VR ;
Kwon, C ;
Stevens, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 40 (02) :221-226
[5]   Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? [J].
Filler, G ;
Lepage, N .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 18 (10) :981-985
[6]   Contrast media as markers of GFR [J].
Frennby, B ;
Sterner, G .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :475-484
[7]  
GRUBB A, 1985, ACTA MED SCAND, V218, P499
[8]   Cystatin C - Properties and use as diagnostic marker [J].
Grubb, AO .
ADVANCES IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 35, 2001, 35 :63-99
[9]   A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate [J].
Hoek, FJ ;
Kemperman, FAW ;
Krediet, RT .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (10) :2024-2031
[10]   A METHOD FOR THE CALCULATION OF RENAL CLEARANCE BASED ON A SINGLE PLASMA SAMPLE [J].
JACOBSSON, L .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 3 (04) :297-305