Assessing and testing interrater agreement on a single target using multi-item rating scales

被引:25
作者
Lindell, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Hazard Reduct & Recovery Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
aggregation; cross-level analysis; interrater agreement;
D O I
10.1177/01466216010251007
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
An index for assessing interrater agreement with respect to a single target using a multi-item rating scale is developed. The variance of rarer mean scale scores is used as the numerator of the agreement index. Four variants of a disattenuated agreement index that vary in the random response term used as the denominator are examined. A variant of r'(wg( J )) using perfectly collinear, uniformly distributed responses as the baseline is recommended as a useful index of disattenuated agreement. A test of the equality of variances is recommended for deleting items with a level of interrater agreement significantly different from zero but tower than that of the remaining items.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 99
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[2]  
Glass G., 1970, Statistical methods in education and psychology
[3]   ESTIMATING WITHIN-GROUP INTERRATER RELIABILITY WITH AND WITHOUT RESPONSE BIAS [J].
JAMES, LR ;
DEMAREE, RG ;
WOLF, G .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (01) :85-98
[4]   A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target [J].
Lindell, MK ;
Brandt, CJ ;
Whitney, DJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 23 (02) :127-135
[5]   Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test:: A comparison of the CVI, T, rWG(J), and r*WG(J) indexes [J].
Lindell, MK ;
Brandt, CJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 84 (04) :640-647
[6]   Measuring interrater agreement for ratings of a single target [J].
Lindell, MK ;
Brandt, CJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1997, 21 (03) :271-278
[7]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY AND AGREEMENT OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENTS [J].
TINSLEY, HEA ;
WEISS, DJ .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 22 (04) :358-376