Irrigation management in arid areas affected by surface crust

被引:5
作者
Abu-Awwad, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Resources & Environm, Amman, Jordan
关键词
surface crust; blocked-end furrows; sprinkler; supplemental irrigation;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00056-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 [作物学];
摘要
The effects of supplemental irrigation and irrigation practices on soil water storage and barley crop yield were studied for a crust-forming soil at the University of Jordan Research Station near Al-Muwaqqar village during the 1996/97 growing season. An amount of 0.0, 48.9, 73.3, 122.2 and 167 mm supplemental irrigation water were applied. The 48.9, 73.3 and 122.2 mm applications were applied through surface irrigation into furrows with blocked ends, and the 0.0 and 167 mm applications via sprinkler irrigation. The greatest water infiltration and subsequent soil storage was achieved with the 122.2 mm application followed by the 73.3 mm irrigation, both surface applied. Application efficiency (the fraction of applied water that infiltrated into the soil and stored in the 600 mm soil profile) and soil water storage associated with supplemental blocked furrow irrigation was significantly greater than with supplemental sprinkler irrigation. For arid zone soil, which has little or no structural stability, application of supplemental irrigation water via short, blocked-end furrows prevents runoff and increases the opportunity time for infiltration, thereby increasing the amount of applied water that is infiltrated into the soil and stored in the soil profile. Supplemental irrigation, applied by a low-rate sprinkler system, was not as effective because of the low infiltration rates that resulted from the development of a surface throttle due to dispersion of soil aggregates at the soil surface. The differences in stored water had a significant effect on grain and straw yields of barley. Without supplemental irrigation, barley grain and straw yields were zero in natural rainfall cultivation with a total rainfall of 136.5 mm. Barley yields in the control treatment, with a 167 mm supplemental sprinkler irrigation were low being 0.19 and 1.09 ton/ha of barley grain and straw, respectively. Supplemental irrigation through blocked-end furrows increased barley grain and straw yields significantly compared with supplemental sprinkler irrigation to a maximum of 0.59 and 1.8 ton/ha, respectively. The improvement coming from the increased water storage associated with furrows. Since irrigation water is very limited if available, farmers are encouraged to form such furrows for reducing runoff from rainfall thereby increasing the amount of water available for forage and field crop production. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 32
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Water harvesting and infiltration in arid areas affected by surface crust: examples from Jordan [J].
AbuAwwad, AM ;
Shatanawi, MR .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1997, 37 (03) :443-452
[2]
Water infiltration and redistribution within soils affected by a surface crust [J].
AbuAwwad, AM .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1997, 37 (02) :231-242
[3]
Reductions in hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate in relation to aggregate stability and irrigation water turbidity [J].
AbuSharar, TM ;
Salameh, AS .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (01) :53-62
[4]
Irrigation and soil surface management in arid soils with surface crust [J].
Akasheh, OZ ;
AbuAwwad, AM .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1997, 37 (02) :243-250
[5]
FAO-24 REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FACTORS [J].
ALLEN, RG ;
PRUITT, WO .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1991, 117 (05) :758-774
[6]
ALQINNA IM, 1997, THESIS U JORDAN AMMA
[7]
Arnon I, 1972, CROP PRODUCTION ARID, P650
[8]
MICROMORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL CRUST TYPES IN NORTHWESTERN ALBERTA, CANADA [J].
ARSHAD, MA ;
MERMUT, AR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (03) :724-729
[9]
Ayers R, 1985, 29 FAO
[10]
A REVIEW OF RAINWATER HARVESTING [J].
BOERS, TM ;
BENASHER, J .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1982, 5 (02) :145-158