Optimal timing for electrical defibrillation after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation

Objective: It currently is recommended that electrical shocks be delivered immediately on recognition of ventricular fibrillation. However, decreased effectiveness of this approach has been reported after prolonged intervals of untreated ventricular fibrillation. We investigated the optimal strategy for successful defibrillation after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation by using a rat model of ventricular fibrillation and closed-chest resuscitation. Design: Controlled, randomized, laboratory study. Setting: Research laboratory at a VA hospital. Subjects: Seventy pentobarbital anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions. After 10 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, four groups of rats were randomized to receive electrical shocks (which we designated as "experimental shocks") immediately before or at 2, 4, or 6 mins of chest compression. Unsuccessfully defibrillated rats received additional shocks (which we designated as "rescue shocks") after 8 mins of chest compression. Measurements and Main Results., The number of rats that restored spontaneous circulation after the experimental shocks increased with increasing duration of the predefibrillatory interval of chest compression (0 of 8, 0 of 8, 2 of 8, and 7 of 8, respectively, p < .005). Two additional groups then were randomized to receive repetitive experimental shocks at 2, 4, and 6 mins or a single attempt at 6 mins of chest compression. Although a comparable number of rats restored spontaneous circulation in each group, rats subjected to repetitive defibrillation attempts had more intense postresuscitation ectopic activity and worse survival. Two final groups were used to investigate whether inhibition of the sarcolemmal sodium-hydrogen exchanger isoform-1 (NHE-1) could facilitate return of spontaneous circulation during repetitive defibrillation attempts. Although spontaneous circulation was restored earlier in more rats subjected to NHE-1 inhibition, the differences were statistically insignificant. NHE-1 inhibition, however, replicated previously reported resuscitation and postresuscitation benefits. The optimal predefibrillation interval of chest compression was approximate to6 mins, and this coincided with partial return of the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the ventricular fibrillation waveform to those present immediately after induction of ventricular fibrillation. Conclusions: Improved outcome after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation may result from strategies that provide chest compression before attempting defibrillation and avoid early and repetitive defibrillation attempts. The amplitude and frequency characteristics of the ventricular fibrillation waveform could help identify the optimal timing for attempting electrical defibrillation.