Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin: Evaluation of five nomograms for initial dosing at Al-Amiri Hospital in Kuwait

被引:8
作者
Al-Lanqawi, Yousef
Capps, Phillip
Abdel-hamid, Mohamed
Abulmalek, Kefaya
Phillips, Dotun
Matar, Kamal
Sharma, Prem
Thusu, Anil
机构
[1] Al Amiri Hosp, Dept Pharm, Minist Hlth, Hawaly 32005, Kuwait
[2] Al Amiri Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Minist Hlth, Hawaly 32005, Kuwait
[3] Al Amiri Hosp, Dept Med, Minist Hlth, Hawaly 32005, Kuwait
[4] Kuwait Univ, Hlth Sci Comp Ctr, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Safat 13060, Kuwait
[5] Kuwait Univ, Hlth Sci Comp Ctr, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, Safat 13060, Kuwait
[6] Kuwait Univ, Hlth Sci Comp Ctr, Fac Pharm, Dept Appl Therapeut, Safat 13060, Kuwait
关键词
gentamicin; initial dosing nomograms; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1159/000104807
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare five published nomograms ( Thomson guidelines, Mawer nomogram, rule of eights, Hull-Sarubbi table and Dettli method) for calculating the initial gentamicin dosage regimen in a Kuwaiti population. Materials and Methods: Based on measured peak and trough gentamicin concentrations, the elimination rate constant and volume of distribution of gentamicin were calculated for each patient (n = 56), using a modified two-point Sawchuk-Zaske method. The calculated individual set of pharmacokinetic parameters and the initial dose regimen recommended by each of the five methods were used to predict the steady-state peak and trough of gentamicin concentrations. Results: The Thomson guidelines produced consistent results in predicting gentamicin concentrations within the target ranges of peak plus trough, peak only and trough only ( 63, 75 and 75%, respectively). The Mawer nomogram, Hull-Sarubbi table and Dettli methods achieved similar percentages of patients (46-50%) within the target ranges (5-10 mg center dot l(-1) for peak and 0.5-2 for trough), whereas empirical dosing and the rule of eights showed the lowest percentages of patients within the peak plus trough target range ( 25 and 37%, respectively). However, with respect to the under-dosing target range (predicted concentration < 5 mg center dot l(-1)), the Thomson guidelines showed that 21% of patients were underdosed. Conclusion: The results show that a large number of patients (37-63%) were outside the target ranges in all initial gentamicin dosing methods evaluated in this study. Therefore, serum concentration measurement can be advised to assist in the optimization of gentamicin dose selection. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 354
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Therapeutic drug monitoring of high-dose gentamicin in an elderly patient: A case report [J].
Al-lanqawi, YM ;
Capps, P ;
Abdulmalik, K .
MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2005, 14 (05) :363-365
[2]   A meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of single daily dosing versus multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides [J].
Ali, MZ ;
Goetz, MB .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (05) :796-809
[3]  
Anaizi N, 1997, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V35, P223
[4]  
Barza M, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P338
[5]  
CAVANSON GC, 1984, APPL PROBABILITY STA
[6]  
DETTLI LC, 1974, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V16, P274
[7]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[8]   ONCE-DAILY AMINOGLYCOSIDE THERAPY [J].
GILBERT, DN .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 35 (03) :399-405
[10]   Single daily dosing of aminoglycosides in immunocompromised adults: A systematic review [J].
Hatala, R ;
Dinh, TT ;
Cook, DJ .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (05) :810-815