Comparison of losartan and amlodipine in renally impaired hypertensive patients

被引:22
作者
Fernández-Andrade, C
Russo, D
Iversen, B
Zucchelli, P
Aranda, P
Guerra, L
Casado, S
机构
[1] Hosp Virgen Rocio, Serv Nefrol, Seville 41013, Spain
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Cattedra Nefrol, Naples, Italy
[3] Med Avd Haukeland, Bergen, Norway
[4] Policlin S Orsola, Div Nefrol Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
[5] H Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[6] H Sao Joao, Dept Nephrol, Porto, Portugal
[7] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Serv Nefrol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
essential hypertension; albuminuria; blood pressure; end-stage renal disease; hydrochlororthiazide;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ki.4490576
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Effects of losartan and amlodipine on blood pressure and albuminuria were compared in a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial involving 48 patients with essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure between 95 to 115 mm Hg) and impaired renal function (creatinine clearance of 30 to 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). After four weeks of placebo administration, patients were stratified according to baseline albuminuria (< or greater than or equal to 300 mu g/min) and randomized to once-daily treatment with losartan 50 mg (N = 24) or amlodipine 5 mg (N = 24) for 12 weeks. Titration to losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg was possible at weeks 3 or 6 for patients having an inadequate blood pressure response. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean decreases in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures were significantly larger in the losartan group (-18.1 +/- 7.2 and -27.7 +/- 15.2 mm Hg) than in the amlodipine group (-12.4 +/- 7.5 and -16.3 +/-: 12.1 mm Hg; P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively). The greater antihypertensive response to losartan was not influenced by the initial degree of albuminuria. The losartan and amlodipine regimens were well-tolerated. Baseline levels of albuminuria were reduced after 12 weeks of losartan treatment (median change of -29.5 mu g/min), while amlodipine therapy was associated with a median increase (48.4 mu g/min) in this renal marker at week 12. The treatment difference was statistically significant (P = 0.021). These results indicate that losartan 50 mg, administered alone or in combination with HCTZ 12.5 mg, is more effective than amlodipine 5/10 mg in lowering blood pressure and albuminuria in patients with essential hypertension complicated by impaired renal function.
引用
收藏
页码:S120 / S124
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005
  • [2] PROGRESSION OF RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY - ROLE OF BLOOD-PRESSURE
    BRAZY, PC
    STEAD, WW
    FITZWILLIAM, JF
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 35 (02) : 670 - 674
  • [3] Effects of Losartan on renal function in patients with essential hypertension
    Fauvel, JP
    Velon, S
    Berra, N
    Pozet, N
    Madonna, O
    Zech, P
    Laville, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 28 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [4] HOLDAAS H, 1997, INT SOC NEPHR SIDN A
  • [5] Ikeda Leila S., 1997, Blood Pressure, V6, P35, DOI 10.3109/08037059709086444
  • [7] EFFECT OF ENALAPRIL ON THE PROGRESSION OF CHRONIC-RENAL-FAILURE - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    KAMPER, AL
    STRANDGAARD, S
    LEYSSAC, PP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1992, 5 (07) : 423 - 430
  • [8] Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men
    Klag, MJ
    Whelton, PK
    Randall, BL
    Neaton, JD
    Brancati, FL
    Ford, CE
    Shulman, NB
    Stamler, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY
    LEWIS, EJ
    HUNSICKER, LG
    BAIN, RP
    ROHDE, RD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (20) : 1456 - 1462
  • [10] PREVENTION OF DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY WITH ENALAPRIL IN NORMOTENSIVE DIABETICS WITH MICROALBUMINURIA
    MARRE, M
    CHATELLIER, G
    LEBLANC, H
    GUYENE, TT
    MENARD, J
    PASSA, P
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6656): : 1092 - 1095