Is firm trust essential in a trusted environment? How trust in the business context influences customers

被引:172
作者
Grayson, Kent [1 ]
Johnson, Devon [2 ]
Chen, Der-Fa Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Business Adm, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Business, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
trust; customer relationship management; financial services marketing; sociological theories;
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.45.2.241
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Customers are influenced not only by how much they trust a company and its representatives but also by how much they trust the broader context in which the market exchange is taking place. In this article, the authors test two rival sociological perspectives regarding the influence of customer trust in the broader context. One perspective proposes that trust in the context replaces trust in individual firms and their representatives. This view suggests that firm/representative trust is not always critical, especially for customers with high trust in the context. An alternative perspective is that trust in the context fosters and legitimates trust in firms and their representatives. This view implies that firm/ representative trust is a necessary mediator of the influence of trust in the context. The authors test predictions based on both perspectives, using empirical results from two studies implemented in two countries. The results from both studies support the proposition that trust in firms and their representatives is a necessary mediator of trust in the broader context.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 256
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[81]   Interfirm cooperation and customer orientation [J].
Rindfleisch, A ;
Moorman, C .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (04) :421-436
[82]   Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption [J].
Roberts, PW ;
Greenwood, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (02) :346-373
[83]   Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust [J].
Rousseau, DM ;
Sitkin, SB ;
Burt, RS ;
Camerer, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :393-404
[84]   Marriage and trust: some lessons from economics [J].
Rowthorn, R .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 23 (05) :661-691
[85]   Employee attitude surveys in a multinational organization: Considering language and culture in assessing measurement equivalence [J].
Ryan, AM ;
Chan, D ;
Ployhart, RE ;
Slade, LA .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (01) :37-58
[86]   Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities [J].
Scott, W. Richard .
MANAGEMENT, 2014, 17 (02) :136-140
[87]   Promoting relationship learning [J].
Selnes, F ;
Sallis, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (03) :80-95
[88]   THE SOCIAL-CONTROL OF IMPERSONAL TRUST [J].
SHAPIRO, SP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1987, 93 (03) :623-658
[89]   The grammars of trust: A model and general implications [J].
Sheppard, BH ;
Sherman, DM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :422-437
[90]   The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships [J].
Smith, JB ;
Barclay, DW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (01) :3-21