Limited intersex mimicry of floral odour in Ficus carica

被引:54
作者
Grison-Pigé, L
Bessière, JM
Turlings, TCJ
Kjellberg, F
Roy, J
Hossaert-McKey, MM
机构
[1] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, F-34293 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Ecole Natl Super Chim Montpellier, Lab Chim Appl, F-34296 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Zool, CH-2007 Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
figs; headspace; pollination mutualism; variability; volatile compounds;
D O I
10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00553.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. The mutualism between figs and pollinators is strict and pollination of female flowers occurs by deceit. Hence the chemical signal responsible for the encounter of the partners is expected to have limited variability. However, since male and female trees bloom at different times, sexual mimicry may not be necessary. The variability of floral odour blends of Ficus carica was studied between sexes, among trees and over time, as were the quantity and identity of the released compounds. 2. Male and female figs emitted the same compounds, but the quantities and proportions among the compounds differed. 3. The composition of the fig blend and the temporal pattern of emission were similar among trees of the same sex, and emission was synchronized with pollinator presence. 4. Composition of the blend and quantity released changed considerably over time, but at the time of maximal emission, all three compounds known to be essential to attract pollinators were released by male and female figs. 5. In a seasonal environment in which male and female flowers have different phenologies, selection for a strict sexual mimicry of the volatile attractants is weak. The identity of the compounds is the same for male and female figs, but their relative abundance in the blend differ.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 558
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   CIRCADIAN RHYTHMICITY OF FRAGRANCE EMISSION IN FLOWERS OF HOYA-CARNOSA R BR [J].
ALTENBURGER, R ;
MATILE, P .
PLANTA, 1988, 174 (02) :248-252
[2]   Partial avoidance of female inflorescences of a dioecious fig by their mutualistic pollinating wasps [J].
Anstett, MC ;
Gibernau, M ;
Hossaert-McKey, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1390) :45-50
[3]  
BARKER N P, 1985, Bothalia, V15, P607
[4]   CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FICUS [J].
BERG, CC .
EXPERIENTIA, 1989, 45 (07) :605-611
[5]   FLORAL FRAGRANCE DISPARITY BETWEEN 3 TAXA OF LADYSLIPPER CYPRIPEDIUM-CALCEOLUS (ORCHIDACEAE) [J].
BERGSTROM, G ;
BIRGERSSON, G ;
GROTH, I ;
NILSSON, LA .
PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 31 (07) :2315-2319
[6]  
Bergstrom G., 1987, INSECTS PLANTS, P321
[7]  
COMPTON SG, 1990, S AFR J SCI, V86, P39
[8]  
Dobson Heidi E.M., 1994, P47
[9]   Interspecific variation in floral fragrances within the genus Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) [J].
Dobson, HEM ;
Arroyo, J ;
Bergstrom, G ;
Groth, I .
BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY, 1997, 25 (08) :685-706
[10]   BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS IN ORCHID FRAGRANCES [J].
DODSON, CH ;
DRESSLER, RL ;
HILLS, HG ;
ADAMS, RM ;
WILLIAMS, NH .
SCIENCE, 1969, 164 (3885) :1243-&