Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:104
作者
Bekkering, GE
Hendriks, HJM
van Tulder, MW
Knol, DL
Hoeijenbos, M
Oostendorp, RAB
Bouter, LM
机构
[1] Dutch Inst Allied Hlth Care Res & Dev, NL-3800 BD Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Inst Med Technol Assessment, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Free Univ Brussels, Fac Med & Pharmacol, Brussels, Belgium
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2005年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2003.009357
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain. Design: A cluster randomised controlled trial comparing an active strategy with standard dissemination. Setting: Primary care physiotherapy practices. Participants: 113 physiotherapists were randomly allocated to receive the guidelines by mail (control group) or to receive an additional active strategy (intervention group) which consisted of a multifaceted programme including education, discussion, role playing, feedback, and reminders. Main outcome measures: Adherence to the guidelines was measured by means of individual patients' forms recording the treatment completed by the physiotherapist. The forms were assessed using an algorithm based on the number of treatment sessions, treatment goals, interventions, and patient education. Results: Physiotherapists in the intervention group more often correctly limited the number of treatment sessions for patients with a normal course of back pain (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.12), more often set functional treatment goals (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.72), more often used mainly active interventions (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.19 to 6.55), and more often gave adequate patient education (OR 3.59; 95% CI 1.35 to 9.55). They also adhered more to all four criteria (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.65). Conclusions: The active strategy moderately improved adherence to the guidelines. Active strategies are recommended to implement the clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines [J].
Adams, AS ;
Soumerai, SB ;
Lomas, J ;
Ross-Degnan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (03) :187-192
[2]   Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain - A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies [J].
Assendelft, WJJ ;
Morton, SC ;
Yu, EI ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
Shekelle, PG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :871-881
[3]   Development of an implementation strategy for physiotherapy guidelines on low back pain [J].
Bekkering, GE ;
Engers, AJ ;
Wensing, M ;
Hendriks, HJM ;
van Tulder, MW ;
Oostendorp, RAB ;
Bouter, LM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2003, 49 (03) :208-214
[4]  
Bekkering GE., 2003, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V89, P82, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2, 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2]
[5]  
BEKKERING GE, 2001, FYSIOPRAXIS, V4, P28
[6]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[7]   A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Sherman, KJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Shekelle, PG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :898-906
[8]  
DAVIS DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P700
[9]  
Davis DA, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V157, P408
[10]  
*DSI, 1999, CHANG PROF PRACT THE