Recovery profile and side effects of remifentanil-based anaesthesia with desflurane or propofol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:45
作者
Grundmann, U [1 ]
Silomon, M [1 ]
Bach, F [1 ]
Becker, S [1 ]
Bauer, M [1 ]
Larsen, B [1 ]
Kleinschmidt, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
关键词
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; remifentanil; desflurane; propofol; emergence times;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045003320.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been suggested to contribute to bowel distension, resulting in worsened operating conditions for laparoscopic surgery, and to increase incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Therefore, our objective was to assess the feasibility of two remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens free from N2O with special regard to recovery profile, postoperative analgesic demand and side effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Fifty patients (ASA I-II, 23-65 yr) were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-based anaesthesia in conjunction with propofol (group R/P) or desflurane (group R/D). After standardised induction of anaesthesia, analgesia was continued with remifentanil in all patients. For maintenance of hypnosis, propofol or desflurane were used in concentrations to ensure loss of consciousness, lack of awareness, and maintenance of heart rate and blood pressure within +/-25% of initial values. At the end of surgery all anaesthetics were discontinued without tapering and early emergence and recovery were recorded, rain scores were assessed by using a visual analogue scale. Patient controlled analgesia with i.v. piritramide was used for treatment of postoperative pain and recorded for 90 min in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). In addition, side effects were noted. Results: Early emergence from anaesthesia did not differ be-tween the groups. In group R/P, time to eye opening, spontaneous respiration and extubation was 4.4 +/- 2.9 min, 5.2 +/- 3.4 min and 5.5 +/- 3.3 min respectively, compared with 4.7 +/- 2.7 min, 5.3 +/- 2.4 min and 5.7 +/- 2.5 min in group R/D. While pain scores did not differ between both groups on admission to the PACU, patients receiving desflurane required more i.v. piritramide as compared to those receiving propofol, 22.0 +/- 6.5 mg and 17.9 +/- 7.0 mg, respectively (P<0.05). Nausea was less frequent after propofol (16% vs. 48%, P<0.05). Conclusion: In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens in conjunction with propofol or desflurane are suitable and allow for rapid recovery from anaesthesia. However, the use of propofol results in less postoperative analgesic consumption and nausea as compared to desflurane.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 326
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Albrecht S, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS40, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00008
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[3]   ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR BINARY, ORDERED CATEGORICAL, AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN 2 GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
CAMPBELL, MJ ;
JULIOUS, SA ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7013) :1145-1148
[4]  
CUNNINGHAM AJ, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P1120
[5]  
CUNNINGHAM AJ, 1994, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V8, P1272
[6]   Omission of nitrous oxide during anesthesia reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting - A meta-analysis [J].
Divatia, JV ;
Vaidya, JS ;
Badwe, RA ;
Hawaldar, RW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) :1055-1062
[7]   HAZARDS OF NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN BOWEL OBSTRUCTION AND PNEUMOTHORAX [J].
EGER, EI ;
SAIDMAN, LJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1965, 26 (1P1) :61-+
[8]  
Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
[9]  
Grundmann U, 1998, ANAESTHESIST, V47, P102, DOI 10.1007/s001010050534
[10]   A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery [J].
Hogue, CW ;
Bowdle, TA ;
OLeary, C ;
Duncalf, D ;
Miguel, R ;
Pitts, M ;
Streisand, J ;
Kirvassilis, G ;
Jamerson, B ;
McNeal, S ;
Batenhorst, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (02) :279-285