The influence of organizational factors on safety in Taiwanese high-risk industries

被引:35
作者
Hsu, Shang Hwa [2 ]
Lee, Chun-Chia [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Muh-Cherng [2 ]
Takano, Kenichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Fooyin Univ, Dept Informat & Management, Ta Liao 831, Kaohsiung Count, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Syst Design & Management, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088345, Japan
关键词
Organizational factors; Safety climate; Safety management; High-risk industry; Guanxi-oriented culture; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE; CULTURE; MODEL; VALIDATION; GUANXI; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2010.06.018
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Organizational theorists have recently begun to pay research attention to the workforces of emerging countries in Asia, especially the greater China regions. However, little research has focused on the influence of organizational factors on safety in these countries. This study hypothesized that organizational factors, characterized as safety leadership perspective (management commitment, blame culture) and safety climate perspective (harmonious relationships), would influence group-level safety management, which would in turn influence individual level safety awareness and practices. To test this hypothesis, a safety climate questionnaire was distributed to ten Taiwanese plants in high-risk industries. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the linkages among organizational level factors, work-group-level factors, and workers' safety awareness and practices. We found that safety leadership style and organizational harmony in Taiwanese high-risk industries can exert significant influences on work-group processes, which in turn have greater effects on individual safety awareness and practices. These findings and implications can serve as a basis for safety improvement in areas of the greater China region. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[3]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/bf02723327]
[4]  
BARLING J, 1999, 25 ANN M AC MAN TOR
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]   ON THE FIT OF MODELS TO COVARIANCES AND METHODOLOGY TO THE BULLETIN [J].
BENTLER, PM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :400-404
[7]  
Churchill G.A., 1991, MARKETING RES METHOD, V5th
[8]   A SAFETY CLIMATE MEASURE FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES [J].
DEDOBBELEER, N ;
BELAND, F .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1991, 22 (02) :97-103
[9]   Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety [J].
DeJoy, DM .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2005, 43 (02) :105-129
[10]   Critical success factors for behavior-based safety: A study of twenty industry-wide applications [J].
DePasquale, JP ;
Geller, ES .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1999, 30 (04) :237-249