SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description

被引:153
作者
Rathnayaka, Samith [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ]
Amyotte, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Proc Engn & Appl Sci, Halifax, NS B3J 2X4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Accident precursors; Process accident model; Predictive model; Bayesian updating; RISK ANALYSIS; OFFSHORE OIL; MANAGEMENT; BARRIER; SOCIETY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many process accidents are controlled and mitigated before they escalate to major events. Unfortunately some do go on to produce catastrophic consequences. As the size and complexity of processing facilities increases, the risks posed by accidents are alarming. Operational safety could be improved by giving emphasis to the prevention of incidents, rather than relying on control and mitigative measures. This method is referred to as an "inherently safer design approach". To prevent major, though infrequent, event occurrence, it is important to consider accident precursors (symptoms of hazards) such as operational deviations, mishaps, and near misses, in order to prevent events at source rather than controlling or mitigating them. This paper describes a recently developed process accident model with predictive capabilities. It uses a combination of event and fault tree concepts to model the cause-consequence relationship. The model relies on process history, accident precursor information, and accident causation modeling. The model is able to capture the process operational behavior, and update the accident likelihood using the Bayesian updating mechanism. The predictive abilities of the model, along with risk estimation, help to develop and prioritize inherently safer design and operational strategies. This is Part I of two papers, focusing on implementation of this methodology. Part II deals with application of the methodology. (C) 2011 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 164
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMP SUG DUST EXPL FI
[3]   Occupational accident models - Where have we been and where are we going? [J].
Attwood, Daryl ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Veitch, Brian .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2006, 19 (06) :664-682
[4]   Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release) Part I. Method description [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Sklet, Snorre ;
Vinnem, Jan Erik .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 137 (02) :681-691
[5]  
Bahr N.J., 1997, SYSTEM SAFETY ENG RI
[6]  
BENNER L, 1978, AAM IAATH C JUL 10 1
[7]  
Bird F.E., 1996, Practical loss control leadership
[8]  
Crowl D.A., 2002, FUNDAMENTALS APPL
[9]  
*CSB, 2007, BP AM REF EXPL TEX C
[10]  
DIANOUS DV, 2006, J HAZARD MATER, V130, P220