Flood risk perception in lands "protected" by 100-year levees

被引:236
作者
Ludy, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Kondolf, G. Matt [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Rivers, Div Flood Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Landscape Architecture & Environm Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Risk perception; Flood insurance; 100-year flood; Levee; Residual risk; Delta; HAZARD; MITIGATION; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Under the US National Flood Insurance Program, lands behind levees certified as protecting against the 100-year flood are considered to be out of the officially recognized "floodplain." However, such lands are still vulnerable to flooding that exceeds the design capacity of the levees-known as residual risk. In the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California, we encounter the curious situation that lands below sea level are considered not "floodplain" and open to residential and commercial development because they are "protected" by levees. Residents are not informed that they are at risk from floods, because officially they are not in the floodplain. We surveyed residents of a recently constructed subdivision in Stockton, California, to assess their awareness of their risk of flooding. Median household income in the development was $80,000, 70% of respondents had a 4-year university degree or higher, and the development was ethnically mixed. Despite the levels of education and income, they did not understand the risk of being flooded. Given that literature shows informed individuals are more likely to take preventative measures than uninformed individuals, our results have important implications for flood policy. Climate-change-induced sea-level rise exacerbates the problems posed by increasing urbanization and aging infrastructure, increasing the threat of catastrophic flooding in the California Delta and in flood-prone areas worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 842
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Myths and Facts About the National Flood Insurance Program
  • [2] A new approach to risk: The implications of E3
    Bea, Robert
    Mitroff, Ian
    Farber, Daniel
    Foster, Howard
    Roberts, Karlene H.
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 11 (01): : 30 - 43
  • [3] Bell H. M., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004
  • [4] Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation
    Brilly, M
    Polic, M
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (03) : 345 - 355
  • [5] Burby R. J., 2001, Environmental Hazards, V3, P111
  • [6] Perceptions of flood risk: A case study of the Red River flood of 1997
    Burn, DH
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (11) : 3451 - 3458
  • [7] 'It'll never happen to me': understanding public awareness of local flood risk
    Burningham, Kate
    Fielding, Jane
    Thrush, Diana
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2008, 32 (02) : 216 - 238
  • [8] Carter NT, 2005, RL33129 CRS LIB C
  • [9] NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF CAUSES OF DEATH
    COMBS, B
    SLOVIC, P
    [J]. JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1979, 56 (04): : 837 - &
  • [10] Dillman DA., 2000, Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method