Optimal cutoff point of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression according to normal levels of social and occupational functioning

被引:57
作者
Romera, Irene [1 ]
Perez, Victor [2 ]
Manuel Menchon, Jose [3 ]
Polavieja, Pepa [1 ]
Gilaberte, Inmaculada [1 ]
机构
[1] Lilly SA, Dept Clin Res, E-28108 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp St Pau & Santa Creu, Dept Psychiat, CIBERSAM, E-08025 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Llobregat, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Dept Psychiat, CIBERSAM, E-08907 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Major depressive disorder; Remission; Social and occupational functioning; STAR-ASTERISK-D; RESIDUAL SYMPTOMS; REMISSION; DISORDER; RECOVERY; OUTPATIENTS; RELAPSE; IMPAIRMENT; RECURRENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2010.06.023
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
The main goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is to achieve remission, defined as the resolution of symptoms and the return to normal levels of functionality. However, the clinical assessment of remission is usually merely based on scores of symptomatic rating scales. One of the most widely used scales to measure remission is the HAM-D-17, in which remission is defined as a score <= 7. Nevertheless, several studies have shown that this cutoff could be too high when also functioning is considered. This is a post-hoc analysis of a 6-month prospective study, performed over a sample of 292 Spanish patients with MDD, in order to find the optimal cutoff in the HAM-D17 scale, considering normal levels of functionality, evaluated by the SOFAS: by means of plotting Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves. Our results show that a score of <= 5 maximized both sensitivity and specificity for identifying normal levels of functionality with respect to other scores, and thus agree with previous works, which suggest that a cutoff <= 7 might be too high to consider remission in patients with MDD, when normal levels of functioning are taken into account. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 137
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
American Psychiatric Association, 2005, HDB PSYCH MEAS
[2]
The Hamilton depression rating scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight? [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Ryder, AG ;
Schuller, DR ;
Marshall, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12) :2163-2177
[3]
Bech P, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P2396, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2396
[4]
THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVITY USING LOGISTIC-MODELS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
REISBY, N ;
ROSENBERG, R ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
NAGY, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 63 (03) :290-299
[5]
Carroll BJ, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P2395, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2395-a
[6]
CONCEPTUALIZATION AND RATIONALE FOR CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS OF TERMS IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER - REMISSION, RECOVERY, RELAPSE, AND RECURRENCE [J].
FRANK, E ;
PRIEN, RF ;
JARRETT, RB ;
KELLER, MB ;
KUPFER, DJ ;
LAVORI, PW ;
RUSH, AJ ;
WEISSMAN, MM .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 48 (09) :851-855
[7]
Depression-related variation in brain morphology over 3 years -: Effects of stress? [J].
Frodl, Thomas S. ;
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos ;
Bottlender, Ronald ;
Born, Christine ;
Jaeger, Markus ;
Scupin, Isabel ;
Reiser, Maximilian ;
Moeller, Hans-Juergen ;
Meisenzahl, Eva M. .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 65 (10) :1156-1165
[8]
Symptomatic recovery and social functioning in major depression [J].
Furukawa, TA ;
Takeuchi, H ;
Hiroe, T ;
Mashiko, H ;
Kamei, K ;
Kitamura, T ;
Takahashi, K .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 103 (04) :257-261
[9]
GOLDMAN HH, 1992, AM J PSYCHIAT, V149, P1148
[10]
Guy W., 1976, U.S. Department of Health, Education, P76